Edward L. Baker is with the Schools of Public Health at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, and at Harvard University, Boston, MA.
Am J Public Health. 2024 May;114(5):489-494. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307598. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
The landmark 1988 Institute of Medicine report served the public health community well by pointing to what needed to be done, fostering a sense of urgency, and offering concrete directions to be pursued. In this article, the impact of the 1988 report, and of the subsequent 2003 report on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), is considered by tracing the course of the ideas that influenced the consciousness of the public health community and subsequently catalyzed concrete action. Among these ideas was that "public health is in disarray." This assessment led to an awareness that something needed to be done. Further, by stating that the public health enterprise had 3 core functions (assessment, policy development, and assurance), the 1988 report set in motion policy development to address the "disarray." At a more fundamental level, both reports championed the need for governmental public health (particularly at the CDC) to take action to strengthen the capacity of local and state public health agencies to address a growing range of public health threats and emergencies. (. 2024;114(5):489-494. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307598).
1988 年医学研究所的具有里程碑意义的报告通过指出需要做什么、激发紧迫感并提供具体的追求方向,很好地为公共卫生界服务。在本文中,通过追溯影响公共卫生界意识并随后催化具体行动的思想轨迹,考虑了 1988 年报告和随后的疾病预防控制中心(CDC)2003 年报告的影响。这些思想之一是“公共卫生一片混乱”。这一评估导致人们意识到需要采取行动。此外,1988 年报告指出公共卫生事业有 3 项核心功能(评估、政策制定和保证),这一报告启动了旨在解决“混乱”的政策制定。在更基本的层面上,两份报告都倡导政府公共卫生(特别是在 CDC)采取行动,加强地方和州公共卫生机构的能力,以应对日益增多的公共卫生威胁和紧急情况。(. 2024;114(5):489-494. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307598)。