Centre for Criminology, Law and Justice, University of New South Wales, Australia.
Int J Drug Policy. 2024 Apr;126:104368. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104368. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
There have been several recent commentaries which have highlighted the relevance of the postcolonial perspective to drug prohibition and called for the decolonisation of drug policy (Daniels et al., 2021; Hillier, Winkler & Lavallée, 2020; Lasco, 2022; Mills, 2019). While these are significant interventions in the field, sparse drugs scholarship has engaged more directly with well-developed literature and concepts from Critical Indigenous Studies (Moreton-Robinson, 2016) and Indigenous Standpoint Theory (Moreton-Robinson, 2013; Nakata, 2007) and reflected on its applicability to the drug and alcohol field. In contrast to the postcolonial perspective, which understands colonisation as a historical event with contemporary impacts, Indigenous scholarship conceptualises colonisation as an active and ongoing part of how the settler-state continues to impose itself. From this vantage point I explore coloniality as a system of power and reflect on the way prohibition acts as a key arm of the settler-colonial state. The paper explores the way concepts like vulnerability, marginality, overrepresentation, disproportionality and addiction involve colonial violence, knowledge practices and narratives which are central to the way coloniality is maintained and continues to assert itself in contemporary settler societies.
最近有几篇评论强调了后殖民观点与毒品禁制之间的相关性,并呼吁毒品政策的非殖民化 (Daniels 等人,2021 年;Hillier、Winkler 和 Lavallée,2020 年;Lasco,2022 年;Mills,2019 年)。虽然这些都是该领域的重要干预措施,但很少有毒品研究更直接地涉及批判性原住民研究(Moreton-Robinson,2016)和原住民立场理论(Moreton-Robinson,2013;Nakata,2007)中发展完善的文献和概念,并思考其在毒品和酒精领域的适用性。与将殖民化理解为具有当代影响的历史事件的后殖民观点相反,原住民学术将殖民化概念化为定居者国家继续强加自身的一种积极和持续的方式。从这个角度出发,我探讨了殖民性作为一种权力系统,并反思了禁制如何成为定居者殖民国家的关键手段。本文探讨了脆弱性、边缘化、过度代表、不成比例和成瘾等概念如何涉及殖民暴力、知识实践和叙事,这些都是维持殖民性以及使其在当代定居者社会中继续存在的核心。