University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2024 Jun;59(6):1614-1621. doi: 10.1002/ppul.26953. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
Cystic fibrosis (CF) treatment has increasingly focused on highly effective modulators. Despite measurable benefits of modulators, there is little guidance for CF care team members on providing education and support to patients regarding initiation of these therapies. We aimed to explore patient, caregiver, and clinician perceptions of modulators and influences on decisions about starting cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) modulators.
We conducted semistructured interviews with CF clinicians, adults with CF, and caregivers of children with CF. We reviewed audio recordings and coded responses to identify central themes.
We interviewed 8 CF clinicians, 9 adults with CF, and 11 caregivers of children with CF. Themes centered on emotional responses to modulator availability, influences on decision-making, concerns about side effects, impact of modulators on planning for the future, the benefits of the multidisciplinary CF care team in supporting treatment decisions, and the unique needs of people with CF who are not eligible for modulators. Clinicians described changes in conversations about modulators since the approval of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor, specifically greater willingness to prescribe with less nuanced conversations with patients and/or caregivers regarding their use.
Based on perspectives and experiences of CF clinicians, adults with CF, and caregivers of children with CF, we suggest clinicians approach conversations about CFTR modulators thoughtfully and thoroughly, utilizing the multidisciplinary model of CF care in exploring patient and caregiver emotions while filling in knowledge gaps, asking about treatment goals beyond potential clinical benefit, and having compassionate conversations with those who are ineligible for modulators.
囊性纤维化 (CF) 的治疗已越来越侧重于高效调节剂。尽管调节剂具有可衡量的益处,但 CF 护理团队成员在为患者提供有关启动这些治疗的教育和支持方面几乎没有指导。我们旨在探讨患者、护理人员和临床医生对调节剂的看法以及对启动囊性纤维化跨膜转导调节因子 (CFTR) 调节剂的决策的影响。
我们对 CF 临床医生、成年 CF 患者和儿童 CF 护理人员进行了半结构式访谈。我们回顾了音频记录并对回复进行了编码,以确定核心主题。
我们采访了 8 名 CF 临床医生、9 名成年 CF 患者和 11 名儿童 CF 护理人员。主题集中在对调节剂可用性的情绪反应、决策影响、对副作用的担忧、调节剂对未来规划的影响、多学科 CF 护理团队在支持治疗决策方面的益处,以及不符合调节剂使用条件的 CF 患者的独特需求。临床医生描述了自 elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor 获得批准以来,关于调节剂的对话发生了变化,特别是更愿意开处方,而与患者和/或护理人员关于其使用的对话则不那么细致入微。
根据 CF 临床医生、成年 CF 患者和儿童 CF 护理人员的观点和经验,我们建议临床医生在进行 CFTR 调节剂的对话时深思熟虑、全面周到,利用 CF 护理的多学科模式,在探讨患者和护理人员的情绪的同时填补知识空白,询问治疗目标超出潜在临床获益,以及与不符合调节剂使用条件的患者进行富有同情心的对话。