Mukonka Victor, Sialubanje Cephas, McAuliffe Fionnuala M, Babaniyi Olusegun, Malumo Sarai, Phiri Joseph, Fitzpatrick Patricia
School of Medicine, Copperbelt University, Ndola, Zambia.
School of Public Health, Levy Mwanawasa Medical University, Lusaka, Zambia.
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 11;19(3):e0296001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296001. eCollection 2024.
To test the effect of providing additional health education during antenatal care (ANC) and a mother-baby delivery pack on institutional deliveries in Monze, Zambia.
16 primary health facilities conducting deliveries in the district.
A total of 5000 pregnant women at any gestation and age attending antenatal care (ANC) services in selected health facilities were eligible for enrolment into the study. Out of these, 4,500 (90%) were enrolled into and completed the study. A total of 3,882 (77.6%) were included in the analysis; 12.4% were not included in the analysis due to incomplete data.
A three-year study (2012 to 2014) analysing baseline delivery data for 2012 and 2013 followed by a community intervention trial was conducted from January to December 2014. Health facilities on the western side were assigned to the intervention arm; those on the eastern side were in the control. In addition to the health education provided during routine ANC visits, participants in the intervention arm received health education and a mother-baby delivery pack when they arrived at the health facility for delivery. Participants in the control arm continued with routine ANC services.
The primary measure was the number of institutional deliveries in both arms over the one-year period. Secondary measures were utilisation of ANC, post-natal care (PNC) and under-five clinic services. Descriptive statistics (frequencies, proportions, means and standard deviation) were computed to summarise participant characteristics. Chi-square and Independent T-tests were used to make comparisons between the two arms. One way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test the effect of the intervention after one year (p-value<0.05). Analysis was conducted using R-studio statistical software version 4.2.1. The p-value<0.05 was considered significant.
Analysis showed a 15.9% increase in the number of institutional deliveries and a significant difference in the mean number of deliveries between intervention and control arms after one year (F(1,46) = 18.85, p<0.001). Post hoc analysis showed a significant difference in the mean number of deliveries between the intervention and control arms for 2014 (p<0.001). Compared to the control arm, participants in the intervention arm returned earlier for PNC clinic visit, brought their children back and started the under-five clinic visits earlier.
These findings provide evidence for the effectiveness of the mother-baby delivery pack and additional health education sessions on increasing institutional deliveries, PNC and under-five children's clinic utilisation in rural Zambia.
ISRCTN Registry (ISRCTN15439813 DOI 10.1186/ISRCTN15439813); Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (PACTR202212611709509).
测试在赞比亚蒙泽地区的产前保健(ANC)期间提供额外健康教育以及母婴分娩包对机构分娩的影响。
该地区16家提供分娩服务的初级卫生设施。
在选定卫生设施接受产前保健(ANC)服务的共5000名任何孕周和年龄的孕妇符合纳入本研究的条件。其中,4500名(90%)被纳入并完成了研究。共有3882名(77.6%)被纳入分析;12.4%因数据不完整未被纳入分析。
一项为期三年的研究(2012年至2014年),先分析2012年和2013年的基线分娩数据,然后于2014年1月至12月进行社区干预试验。西侧的卫生设施被分配到干预组;东侧的为对照组。除了在常规产前检查期间提供的健康教育外,干预组的参与者在到达卫生设施分娩时还接受了健康教育并获得了母婴分娩包。对照组的参与者继续接受常规产前保健服务。
主要指标是两组在一年期间的机构分娩数量。次要指标是产前保健、产后保健(PNC)和五岁以下儿童门诊服务的利用率。计算描述性统计量(频率、比例、均值和标准差)以总结参与者特征。使用卡方检验和独立t检验对两组进行比较。使用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)来测试一年后干预措施的效果(p值<0.05)。使用R-studio统计软件版本4.2.1进行分析。p值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
分析显示机构分娩数量增加了15.9%,一年后干预组和对照组之间的平均分娩数量存在显著差异(F(1,46) = 18.85,p<0.001)。事后分析显示2014年干预组和对照组之间的平均分娩数量存在显著差异(p<0.001)。与对照组相比,干预组的参与者更早返回进行产后保健门诊就诊,带孩子回来并更早开始五岁以下儿童门诊就诊。
这些研究结果为母婴分娩包和额外的健康教育课程在增加赞比亚农村地区的机构分娩、产后保健和五岁以下儿童门诊利用率方面的有效性提供了证据。
国际标准随机对照试验编号注册库(ISRCTN15439813 DOI 10.1186/ISRCTN15439813);泛非临床试验注册库(PACTR202212611709509)。