• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美泊利珠单抗治疗中国重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘的成本效果分析。

Cost-effectiveness of mepolizumab for severe eosinophilic asthma in China.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Xi'an Chest Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, China.

Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, China.

出版信息

J Asthma. 2024 Sep;61(9):1068-1075. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2024.2324855. Epub 2024 Mar 12.

DOI:10.1080/02770903.2024.2324855
PMID:38470879
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the economic value of mepolizumab as an add-on therapy to the standard of care (SoC) for patients with severe eosinophilic asthma in China.

METHODS

A Markov model with three health conditions was constructed to calculate the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) in mepolizumab with SoC and SoC only groups from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system throughout an entire lifespan. The model was populated with local costs, while efficacy parameters were obtained from the global Phase III MENSA trial and mortality was derived from two surveys. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. Additional scenario analysis was used to estimate the cost-effectiveness impact of changes in the price of mepolizumab.

RESULTS

Over the lifetime treatment horizon, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of mepolizumab plus SoC compared to SoC alone was $170 648.73 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses focused on these results. Scenario analysis showed that mepolizumab would require a price reduction of at least 82% to reach the current willingness-to-pay (WTP=$38 223.34/QALY) threshold.

CONCLUSION

Mepolizumab is not a cost-effective healthcare resource in China at its current pricing.

摘要

目的

评估美泊利珠单抗作为重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘患者标准治疗(SOC)附加疗法的经济价值。

方法

采用 Markov 模型,构建了三种健康状况,从中国医疗保健系统的角度,在整个生命周期内计算美泊利珠单抗联合 SOC 治疗组和 SOC 单药治疗组每增加一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的增量成本。模型采用了当地成本,而疗效参数则来自全球 III 期 MENSA 试验,死亡率则来自两项调查。进行了单因素敏感性分析和概率敏感性分析。还进行了额外的情景分析,以估计美泊利珠单抗价格变化对成本效果的影响。

结果

在整个治疗期间,美泊利珠单抗联合 SOC 治疗组与 SOC 单药治疗组相比,增量成本效果比(ICER)为每 QALY 170648.73 美元。敏感性分析主要集中在这些结果上。情景分析显示,美泊利珠单抗的价格至少需要降低 82%,才能达到当前的意愿支付(WTP)阈值(38223.34 美元/QALY)。

结论

按照目前的定价,美泊利珠单抗在中国不是一种具有成本效益的医疗资源。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of mepolizumab for severe eosinophilic asthma in China.美泊利珠单抗治疗中国重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘的成本效果分析。
J Asthma. 2024 Sep;61(9):1068-1075. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2024.2324855. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
2
Assessing the value of mepolizumab for severe eosinophilic asthma: a cost-effectiveness analysis.评估美泊利珠单抗治疗重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘的价值:一项成本效益分析。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2017 Feb;118(2):220-225. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2016.10.028. Epub 2016 Dec 4.
3
Mepolizumab for Treating Severe Eosinophilic Asthma: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.美泊利珠单抗治疗严重嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘:NICE 单技术评估的循证评估组观点。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Feb;36(2):131-144. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0571-8.
4
Assessing the cost-effectiveness of mepolizumab as add-on therapy to standard of care for severe eosinophilic asthma in Singapore.评估美泊利珠单抗作为新加坡重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘标准治疗附加疗法的成本效益。
J Asthma. 2022 Jan;59(1):189-199. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2020.1837158. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
5
A cost-effectiveness analysis of reslizumab in the treatment of poorly controlled eosinophilic asthma.瑞利珠单抗治疗控制不佳的嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘的成本效益分析。
J Asthma. 2019 Aug;56(8):872-881. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2018.1500584. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
6
Cost effectiveness of benralizumab for severe, uncontrolled oral corticosteroid-dependent asthma in Sweden.贝那鲁肽治疗瑞典严重、无法控制的口服皮质类固醇依赖型哮喘的成本效益分析。
J Med Econ. 2020 Aug;23(8):877-884. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1760285. Epub 2020 May 13.
7
Economic analysis of the phase III MENSA study evaluating mepolizumab for severe asthma with eosinophilic phenotype.评估美泊利珠单抗治疗嗜酸性粒细胞型重度哮喘的III期MENSA研究的经济分析。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2017 Apr;17(2):121-131. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2017.1298444. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
8
Economic evaluation and budgetary burden of mepolizumab in severe refractory eosinophilic asthma.美泊利单抗治疗重度难治性嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘的经济学评估及预算负担
Farm Hosp. 2019 Nov 1;43(6):187-193. doi: 10.7399/fh.11221.
9
Cost-utility analysis of dupilumab add on therapy versus standard therapy in adolescents and adults for severe asthma in Colombia.度普利尤单抗附加疗法与标准疗法用于哥伦比亚青少年和成人重度哮喘的成本效用分析
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2022 Jun;22(4):575-580. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2022.2011217. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
10
Cost-Effectiveness of Bronchial Thermoplasty, Omalizumab, and Standard Therapy for Moderate-to-Severe Allergic Asthma.支气管热成形术、奥马珠单抗及标准疗法治疗中重度过敏性哮喘的成本效益分析
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 11;11(1):e0146003. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146003. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Mepolizumab in Severe Pediatric Asthma: Certainties and Doubts through a Single-Center Experience and Review of the Literature.美泊利珠单抗治疗重度小儿哮喘:基于单中心经验及文献综述的肯定与疑问
Children (Basel). 2024 Jul 25;11(8):895. doi: 10.3390/children11080895.