Suppr超能文献

维奈克拉联合阿扎胞苷和地西他滨治疗复发/难治性急性髓系白血病:一项开放标签、单臂、2 期研究。

Venetoclax plus cytarabine and azacitidine in relapsed/refractory AML: An open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study.

机构信息

Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China; Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Diseases, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China; Zhejiang Province Key Laboratory of Hematology Oncology Diagnosis and Treatment, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.

Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China; Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Diseases, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 2024 May;202:113979. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.113979. Epub 2024 Mar 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The outcome of relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains extremely poor. Venetoclax (VEN)-based regimens have shown promise in treating R/R AML.

OBJECTIVE

This phase 2 study aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of the VAA regimen (VEN plus Cytarabine and Azacitidine) in R/R AML patients.

METHODS

Thirty R/R AML patients were enrolled. The study adopted a stepwise ramp-up of VEN dosing, starting with 100 mg on day 1, escalating to 200 mg on day 2, and reaching 400 mg from day 3 to day 9. Cytarabine (10 mg/m, q12h) was administered intravenously twice daily from days 1 to 10, and Azacitidine (75 mg/m) was administered via subcutaneous injection once daily from days 1-7. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite complete remission rate (CRc), including complete response (CR) and complete response with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR), and safety analysis.

RESULTS

The CRc rate was 63.3% (19/30), with CR in 36.7% of patients and CRi in 26.7%. Notably, 14 (73.7%) of 19 patients achieving CRc showed undetectable measurable residual disease by flow cytometry. With a median follow-up of 10.7 months, the median OS had not been reached, and the median DOR was 18.3 months. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia (100%), anemia (96.7%), thrombocytopenia (90.0%), and leukopenia (90.0%). Infections, with pneumonia being the most prevalent (43.3%), were observed, including one fatal case of Pseudomonas aeruginosa septicemia. There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSION

The VAA regimen is an effective and safe option for patients with R/R AML, demonstrating a high CRc rate and manageable safety profile.

摘要

背景

复发/难治性(R/R)急性髓系白血病(AML)的预后仍然极差。基于维奈托克(VEN)的治疗方案在治疗 R/R AML 方面显示出了潜力。

目的

本项 2 期研究旨在系统评估 VAA 方案(VEN 联合阿糖胞苷和阿扎胞苷)在 R/R AML 患者中的疗效和安全性。

方法

共纳入 30 例 R/R AML 患者。该研究采用逐步增加 VEN 剂量的方法,起始剂量为第 1 天 100mg,第 2 天递增至 200mg,第 3 天至第 9 天递增至 400mg。阿糖胞苷(10mg/m2,q12h)每天静脉输注 2 次,从第 1 天至第 10 天;阿扎胞苷(75mg/m2)每天皮下注射 1 次,从第 1 天至第 7 天。主要疗效终点是复合完全缓解率(CRc),包括完全缓解(CR)和不完全血细胞计数恢复的完全缓解(CRi)。次要终点包括总生存期(OS)、缓解持续时间(DOR)和安全性分析。

结果

CRc 率为 63.3%(19/30),其中 36.7%的患者达到 CR,26.7%的患者达到 CRi。值得注意的是,19 例达到 CRc 的患者中有 14 例(73.7%)通过流式细胞术检测到可测残留疾病为阴性。中位随访 10.7 个月时,中位 OS 尚未达到,中位 DOR 为 18.3 个月。最常见的 3-4 级不良事件(AE)是中性粒细胞减少症(100%)、贫血(96.7%)、血小板减少症(90.0%)和白细胞减少症(90.0%)。观察到感染,其中肺炎最常见(43.3%),包括 1 例由铜绿假单胞菌败血症引起的致命病例。无治疗相关死亡。

结论

VAA 方案是 R/R AML 患者的一种有效且安全的选择,具有较高的 CRc 率和可管理的安全性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验