Suppr超能文献

用于头颈癌的姑息性四联放射治疗联合或不联合同期免疫检查点抑制

Palliative Quad Shot Radiation Therapy with or without Concurrent Immune Checkpoint Inhibition for Head and Neck Cancer.

作者信息

Upadhyay Rituraj, Gogineni Emile, Tocaj Glenis, Ma Sung J, Bonomi Marcelo, Bhateja Priyanka, Konieczkowski David J, Baliga Sujith, Mitchell Darrion L, Jhawar Sachin R, Zhu Simeng, Grecula John C, Dibs Khaled, Gamez Mauricio E, Blakaj Dukagjin M

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.

Department of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2024 Mar 5;16(5):1049. doi: 10.3390/cancers16051049.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Patients with recurrent and metastatic head and neck cancer (HNC) have limited treatment options. 'QuadShot' (QS), a hypofractionated palliative radiotherapy regimen, can provide symptomatic relief and local control and may potentiate the effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We compared outcomes of QS ± concurrent ICIs in the palliative treatment of HNC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified patients who received ≥three cycles of QS from 2017 to 2022 and excluded patients without post-treatment clinical evaluation or imaging. Outcomes for patients who received QS alone were compared to those treated with ICI concurrent with QS, defined as receipt of ICI within 4 weeks of QS.

RESULTS

Seventy patients were included, of whom 57% received concurrent ICI. Median age was 65.5 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 57.9-77.8), and 50% patients had received prior radiation to a median dose of 66 Gy (IQR: 60-70). Median follow-up was 8.8 months. Local control was significantly higher with concurrent ICIs (12-month: 85% vs. 63%, = 0.038). Distant control (12-month: 56% vs. 63%, = 0.629) and median overall survival (9.0 vs. 10.0 months, = 0.850) were similar between the two groups. On multivariable analysis, concurrent ICI was a significant predictor of local control (HR for local failure: 0.238; 95% CI: 0.073-0.778; = 0.018). Overall, 23% patients experienced grade 3 toxicities, which was similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of QS with concurrent ICIs was well tolerated and significantly improved local control compared to QS alone. The median OS of 9.4 months compares favorably to historical controls for patients with HNC treated with QS. This approach represents a promising treatment option for patients with HNC unsuited for curative-intent treatment and warrants prospective evaluation.

摘要

目的

复发和转移性头颈癌(HNC)患者的治疗选择有限。“四联放疗”(QS)是一种大分割姑息性放疗方案,可缓解症状并实现局部控制,还可能增强免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)的疗效。我们比较了QS±同步ICI在HNC姑息治疗中的疗效。

材料与方法

我们确定了2017年至2022年期间接受≥三个周期QS治疗的患者,并排除了未进行治疗后临床评估或影像学检查的患者。将单独接受QS治疗的患者的结局与接受QS同步ICI治疗的患者(定义为在QS开始后4周内接受ICI治疗)的结局进行比较。

结果

共纳入70例患者,其中57%接受了同步ICI治疗。中位年龄为65.5岁(四分位间距[IQR]:57.9 - 77.8),50%的患者曾接受过中位剂量为66 Gy(IQR:60 - 70)的放疗。中位随访时间为8.8个月。同步ICI治疗组的局部控制率显著更高(12个月时:85%对63%,P = 0.038)。两组的远处控制率(12个月时:56%对63%,P = 0.629)和中位总生存期(9.0个月对10.0个月,P = 0.850)相似。多变量分析显示,同步ICI是局部控制的显著预测因素(局部失败的风险比:0.238;95%置信区间:0.073 - 0.778;P = 0.018)。总体而言,23%的患者出现3级毒性反应,两组相似。

结论

与单独使用QS相比,QS联合同步ICI耐受性良好,且显著改善了局部控制。9.4个月的中位总生存期优于接受QS治疗的HNC患者的历史对照。这种方法对于不适合进行根治性治疗的HNC患者是一种有前景的治疗选择,值得进行前瞻性评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fe2/10931206/102abf72a740/cancers-16-01049-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验