Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Public Health Management Corporation, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 27;12:1337745. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1337745. eCollection 2024.
BACKGROUND: Widespread access to testing is critical to public health efforts to control the COVID-19 pandemic. Secondary distribution of COVID-19 self-test kits, where an individual distributes test kits to others in their social networks, is a potential strategy to improve access to testing. In this qualitative study, we identified salient beliefs about distributing and accepting COVID-19 self-test kits within one's social network, as well as ordering COVID-19 self-test kits from the government. METHODS: We recruited 61 participants from a randomized controlled trial (NCT04797858) in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania to elicit beliefs about (1) distributing COVID-19 self-test kits within one's social network, (2) receiving test kits from social contacts, and (3) ordering self-test kits from the government. Using validated, open-ended question stems, we identified the most common set of beliefs underlying attitudes, perceived norms (or social referents), and perceived behavioral control (or self-efficacy) toward each of these behaviors. RESULTS: Twenty-seven out of 30 (90%) of participants who received self-test kits reported distributing the kits to social contacts. These participants described altruistic beliefs about giving others access to testing, and felt approval from family members, friends, and others in their social networks. When receiving test kits from social network contacts, participants described advantages of test kit convenience, but some voiced concern about test kit tampering and confusing instructions. Participants also described perceived logistic barriers to distributing and receiving self-test kits, such as delivering or transporting test kits, or finding time to meet. Participants who ordered test kits from the government also described increased convenience of test access, but described different logistic barriers such as delays in test kit delivery, or not receiving test kits at all. CONCLUSION: In comparison with government-ordered test kits, the secondary distribution of COVID-19 self-test kits raised unique concerns about test kit quality and instructions, as well as distinctive logistic barriers related to distributing self-test kits to network contacts, which were not raised for test kits ordered from the government. This study demonstrates that beliefs may vary depending on the type of testing behavior, and behavioral interventions may benefit from developing messages tailored to specific testing strategies.
背景:广泛获得检测对于公共卫生部门控制 COVID-19 大流行的努力至关重要。将 COVID-19 自测试剂盒分发给个人社交网络中的其他人,这是一种提高检测可及性的潜在策略。在这项定性研究中,我们确定了在社交网络中分发和接受 COVID-19 自测试剂盒的相关信念,以及从政府订购 COVID-19 自测试剂盒的信念。
方法:我们从宾夕法尼亚州费城的一项随机对照试验(NCT04797858)中招募了 61 名参与者,以了解他们对以下方面的信念:(1)在社交网络中分发 COVID-19 自测试剂盒,(2)从社交联系人那里收到测试试剂盒,以及(3)从政府订购自测试剂盒。我们使用经过验证的开放式问题引导,确定了这些行为背后态度、感知规范(或社会参照)和感知行为控制(或自我效能)的最常见信念集。
结果:在收到自测试剂盒的 30 名参与者中,有 27 名(90%)报告将试剂盒分发给了社交联系人。这些参与者描述了给予他人检测机会的利他信念,并得到了家庭成员、朋友和社交网络中其他人的认可。当从社交网络联系人那里收到测试试剂盒时,参与者描述了测试试剂盒方便的优势,但有些人担心测试试剂盒被篡改和使用说明混淆。参与者还描述了分发和接收自测试剂盒的感知物流障碍,例如配送或运输测试试剂盒,或找到时间会面。从政府订购测试套件的参与者也描述了增加了测试访问的便利性,但描述了不同的物流障碍,例如测试套件的交付延迟,或者根本没有收到测试套件。
结论:与政府订购的测试套件相比,COVID-19 自测试剂盒的二次分发引起了对测试套件质量和说明的独特关注,以及与向网络联系人分发自测试剂盒相关的独特物流障碍,这些障碍与政府订购的测试套件无关。这项研究表明,信念可能因测试行为类型而异,行为干预措施可能受益于针对特定测试策略定制信息。
Front Public Health. 2024
J Public Health Manag Pract.
Soc Sci Med. 2022-1