Suppr超能文献

导致美国乘用车引入正面安全气囊的影响概述。

Summary of influences that led to introduction of frontal airbags on US passenger vehicles.

机构信息

Retired Senior Executive, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, District of Columbia.

出版信息

Traffic Inj Prev. 2024;25(3):237-248. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2024.2317410. Epub 2024 Mar 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The history of airbags for occupant protection in frontal crashes is reviewed from the perspective of a former Senior Executive at NHTSA from the early 1970's to the late 1980's. This paper summarizes the factors that led to regulatory delays as well as those that led to voluntary adoption of airbags by several manufacturers.

METHODS

The regulatory history and interactions with airbag suppliers and vehicle manufactures is recounted citing key steps in the evolution of frontal airbags.

RESULTS

When the Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Standard 208, "Occupant Protection" was issued on July 2, 1969 the Safety Agency anticipated that the industry response would provide automatic frontal crash protection from airbags that deployed to protect all front seat occupants from injury in severe frontal crashes. It was not until, September 1, 1998 that airbags were required in all cars and light trucks. The interim 29 years involved a series of stops and starts during which most of the original airbag suppliers lost interest and abandoned the airbag market. The issues associated with airbags and their place in Standard 208 were directly influenced by interventions from the President, the Congress, the Supreme Court, Secretaries of Transportation, NHTSA Administrators, the Presidents of US Auto Companies and Senior Executives of Insurance Companies.

CONCLUSION

In 1966, there was support from the US auto industry for a single source of safety regulations that apply to new vehicles sold in the US. This is evidenced by the unanimous passage by the House of Representatives and Senate of the Law that created the Federal auto safety regulatory framework. The Law also required seatbelts in new cars and prohibited States from making separate safety rules. However, the large safety benefits offered by seatbelts were negated because they were rarely used. Consequently, finding ways of providing high levels of protection without requiring action by occupants became a goal of the new Safety Agency. The airbag offered the possibility of achieving that goal.From the initial airbag notice of proposed rulemaking on July 2, 1969, Safety Agency required 2 years to resolve objections before a final Standard 208 could be issued (on July 8,1971). The subsequent industry opposition to the Standard 208 employed Presidential influence and Court suits to cause a 5½ year delay until the Coleman Decision on December 6, 1976. Changes in regulatory approach of the Ford, Carter, and Reagan Administrations and associated Court suits caused another 7½ year delay until the Dole Decision on July 17, 1984. It required another 7 ½, until December 18, 1991, for market forces to reduce industry opposition to airbags and permit Congress to pass a law that mandated them. Another 6½ years of lead time was required before all cars and light trucks were required to meet the airbag standard. During the mid and late 1980's vehicle safety ratings, seatbelt use laws, and Vince and Larry PSA's had all acted to increase safety awareness and safety belt use. Consequently, added public demand for vehicle safety features slowly developed. Changes in economic incentives encouraged a number of vehicle lines to install driver airbags as standard equipment and the feature was being widely advertised by Chrysler. This combination of events made it possible for Congress to pass and President Bush 41 to sign legislation requiring airbags in cars and light trucks by September 1, 1998 - more than 29 years after the initial rulemaking notice in 1969.

摘要

目的

本文回顾了 20 世纪 70 年代至 80 年代末,一位前 NHTSA 高级主管在正面碰撞中乘员保护安全气囊的历史。本文总结了导致监管延迟的因素,以及导致几家制造商自愿采用安全气囊的因素。

方法

本文引用正面安全气囊发展过程中的关键步骤,叙述了监管历史以及与安全气囊供应商和车辆制造商的互动。

结果

1969 年 7 月 2 日发布了《标准 208“乘员保护”高级通知》,安全署预计行业的回应将提供自动正面碰撞保护,从安全气囊部署到保护所有前排座椅乘员免受严重正面碰撞的伤害。直到 1998 年 9 月 1 日,安全气囊才被要求在所有汽车和轻型卡车上使用。这 29 年的过渡期涉及一系列的停止和开始,在此期间,大多数原始的安全气囊供应商失去了兴趣并放弃了安全气囊市场。与安全气囊及其在标准 208 中的地位相关的问题直接受到总统、国会、最高法院、交通部长、NHTSA 管理者、美国汽车公司总裁和保险公司高级管理人员的干预的影响。

结论

1966 年,美国汽车行业支持采用单一的安全法规来源,适用于在美国销售的新车。众议院和参议院通过的法律证明了这一点,该法律创建了美国汽车安全监管框架。该法律还要求新车配备安全带,并禁止各州制定单独的安全规则。然而,安全带带来的大量安全益处被否定了,因为它们很少被使用。因此,寻找在不要求乘员采取行动的情况下提供高水平保护的方法成为了新安全机构的目标。安全气囊提供了实现这一目标的可能性。自 1969 年 7 月 2 日最初的安全气囊法规制定通知发布以来,安全署需要 2 年时间来解决反对意见,然后才能发布最终的标准 208(1971 年 7 月 8 日)。随后,行业对标准 208 的反对意见利用了总统的影响力和法庭诉讼,导致延迟了 5 年半,直到 1976 年 12 月 6 日的 Coleman 裁决。福特、卡特和里根政府的监管方法的变化以及相关的法庭诉讼又导致了另外 7 年半的延迟,直到 1984 年 7 月 17 日的 Dole 裁决。又过了 7 年半,直到 1991 年 12 月 18 日,市场力量才减少了行业对安全气囊的反对,并允许国会通过一项强制使用安全气囊的法律。又过了 6 年半,所有汽车和轻型卡车才被要求达到安全气囊标准。在 80 年代中期和后期,车辆安全评级、安全带使用法和 Vince 和 Larry PSA 都提高了安全意识和安全带使用。因此,对车辆安全功能的公众需求逐渐增加。经济激励措施的变化鼓励了许多汽车生产线将驾驶员安全气囊作为标准设备安装,并由克莱斯勒广泛宣传该功能。这些事件的结合使得国会能够通过并由布什总统签署立法,要求在 1998 年 9 月 1 日前在汽车和轻型卡车上安装安全气囊,比最初的规则制定通知在 1969 年发布后又过去了 29 年。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验