不同剂量的唑拉酮治疗重度抑郁症:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

Different dosage regimens of zuranolone in the treatment of major depressive disorder: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China.

Department of Clinical Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2024 Jun 1;354:206-215. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.03.057. Epub 2024 Mar 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of different dosage regimens of zuranolone in the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD).

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library and other databases were searched from inception until July 2019. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to the efficacy and safety of zuranolone in the treatment of MDD were included. The data were extracted independently by 2 investigators and assessed the study quality by the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The primary outcome includes the 17-item HAMILTON total score (HAMD-17) and the incidence of adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Six high-quality RCTs with 1593 patients were finally included in our analysis. Zuranolone group achieve a notable treatment effect at day15 in HAMD-17 compared with placebo group (MD = -2.69, 95 % CI: -4.45 to -0.94, P < 0.05). For safety, no significant differences existed in the proportion of patients with AEs between zuranolone with placebo (RR = 1.25, 95 % CI: 0.99 to 1.58, P = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

Zuranolone has a significant efficacy in improving depressive symptoms in the short term and is positively correlated with the dosage administered. However, the efficacy of zuranolone decreased significantly when the time of administration was extended. Zuranolone demonstrated a controllable safety issue. But adverse effects increased as the dose of zuranolone was gradually increased to 50 mg.

摘要

目的

研究不同剂量佐拉螺酮治疗重性抑郁障碍(MDD)患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

检索 PubMed、Embase、The Cochrane Library 等数据库,检索时限均从建库至 2019 年 7 月。纳入佐拉螺酮治疗 MDD 的疗效和安全性相关的随机对照试验(RCTs)。由 2 名研究者独立提取数据,并采用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评价研究质量。主要结局包括 17 项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD-17)总分和不良事件(AEs)的发生率。

结果

最终纳入 6 项高质量 RCT,共 1593 例患者。与安慰剂组相比,佐拉螺酮组在第 15 天 HAMD-17 评分上的疗效显著(MD=-2.69,95%CI:-4.45 至-0.94,P<0.05)。安全性方面,佐拉螺酮组与安慰剂组的 AEs 发生率差异无统计学意义(RR=1.25,95%CI:0.99 至 1.58,P=0.06)。

结论

佐拉螺酮在短期内改善抑郁症状具有显著疗效,且与给药剂量呈正相关。然而,随着给药时间的延长,佐拉螺酮的疗效显著降低。佐拉螺酮显示出可控的安全性问题。但随着佐拉螺酮剂量逐渐增加至 50mg,不良反应增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索