Suppr超能文献

研究目标结构化临床考试(R-OSCE):一种评估临床和转化研究能力的创新工具。

The Research Objective Structured Clinical Exam (R-OSCE): An Innovative Tool to Assess Clinical and Translational Research Competencies.

作者信息

Ianni Phillip A, Eakin Brenda L, Samuels Elias M, Champagne Ellen, Ellingrod Vicki L

机构信息

University of Michigan.

出版信息

MedEdPublish (2016). 2021 Sep 3;10:143. doi: 10.15694/mep.2021.000143.2. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. Introduction The Research Objective Structured Clinical Exam (R-OSCE) described in this paper was designed as part of a comprehensive program to assess competency in specific domains of clinical and translational research (CTR) for students enrolled in a 12-week introductory summer research program. Methods The program curriculum was mapped to core competencies developed by the National Center for Translational Science (NCATS) and used to develop R-OSCE stations. Twelve stations were developed, with five administered during orientation as a practice test and seven administered post-program. A scoring rubric using an anchored scale of 1-5 was developed and six qualified raters were trained in its use. The exam was self-paced and delivered through a secure online computer-based platform. Results Forty-seven students (three cohorts) completed the post-program R-OSCE. Most respondents scored at 3 (developing competence) or higher on most stations for both the practice and post-program exams, the exceptions being the stations involving writing research questions and engaging communities in research. Students indicated they liked demonstrating CTR skills through the R-OSCE. Most participants agreed that exam tasks were related to stated program competencies and that stations were realistic. Discussion The R-OSCE is best used as part of a comprehensive assessment program and may be useful in providing formative feedback to trainees that they can share with their mentors. Additionally, this study demonstrated that it could feasibly be used to evaluate the effectiveness of research education programs. However, additional time was needed to train raters and score the R-OSCE. Modifications were made to administer the exam through use of an online format with a modest budget. The computer-based format provides a solution to the current need for assessments that can be administered remotely.

摘要

本文已迁移。该文章被标记为推荐文章。引言 本文所述的研究目标结构化临床考试(R-OSCE)是作为一个综合项目的一部分而设计的,该项目旨在评估参加为期12周夏季基础研究项目的学生在临床和转化研究(CTR)特定领域的能力。方法 该项目课程与美国国家转化科学中心(NCATS)制定的核心能力进行了映射,并用于开发R-OSCE站点。共开发了12个站点,其中5个在迎新期间作为实践测试进行,7个在项目结束后进行。制定了一个使用1-5锚定量表的评分标准,并对6名合格评分员进行了使用培训。考试为自主节奏,通过安全的基于计算机的在线平台进行。结果 47名学生(三个队列)完成了项目结束后的R-OSCE。在实践考试和项目结束后考试的大多数站点上,大多数受访者的得分在3分(发展中能力)或更高,涉及撰写研究问题和让社区参与研究的站点除外。学生们表示他们喜欢通过R-OSCE展示CTR技能。大多数参与者同意考试任务与所述项目能力相关,并且站点是现实的。讨论 R-OSCE最好作为综合评估项目的一部分使用,可能有助于为学员提供可与导师分享的形成性反馈。此外,本研究表明它可切实用于评估研究教育项目的有效性。然而,需要额外的时间来培训评分员和对R-OSCE进行评分。通过使用在线形式并以适度预算进行考试管理进行了修改。基于计算机的形式为当前对可远程进行的评估的需求提供了解决方案。

相似文献

1
4
Evolving to Objective Structured Clinical Exams (OSCE): Transitional experience in an undergraduate pharmacy program in Kuwait.
Saudi Pharm J. 2021 Jan;29(1):104-113. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2020.12.013. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
5
Medical students' perception of objective structured clinical examination: a feedback for process improvement.
J Surg Educ. 2014 Sep-Oct;71(5):701-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.02.010. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
6
An objective structured clinical exam to measure intrinsic CanMEDS roles.
Med Educ Online. 2016 Sep 15;21:31085. doi: 10.3402/meo.v21.31085. eCollection 2016.
8
Assessing the utility of virtual OSCE sessions as an educational tool: a national pilot study.
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Mar 15;22(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03248-3.
10
Digitizing Scoring Systems With Extended Online Feedback: A Novel Approach to Interactive Teaching and Learning in Formative OSCE.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jan 25;8:762810. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.762810. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Reimagining a summer research program during COVID: Strategies for enhancing research workforce diversity.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Feb 28;6(1):e37. doi: 10.1017/cts.2022.371. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Conducting a high-stakes OSCE in a COVID-19 environment.
MedEdPublish (2016). 2020 Mar 27;9:54. doi: 10.15694/mep.2020.000054.1. eCollection 2020.
2
The Fundamental Characteristics of a Translational Scientist.
ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci. 2019 May 2;2(3):213-216. doi: 10.1021/acsptsci.9b00022. eCollection 2019 Jun 14.
3
Indices of Clinical Research Coordinators' Competence.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2019 Jun;3(2-3):75-81. doi: 10.1017/cts.2019.381. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
4
Assessing an assessment: The review and redesign of a competency-based mid-degree evaluation.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2018 Aug;2(4):223-227. doi: 10.1017/cts.2018.321. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
5
Does an Objective Structured Clinical Examination Fit Your Assessment Toolbox?
J Grad Med Educ. 2017 Dec;9(6):771-772. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-17-00655.1.
6
Do coursework summative assessments predict clinical performance? A systematic review.
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Feb 16;17(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0878-3.
7
Family medicine resident OSCEs: a systematic review.
Educ Prim Care. 2016 Nov;27(6):471-477. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2016.1205835. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
9
Assessing Competencies in a Master of Science in Clinical Research Program: The Comprehensive Competency Review.
Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Dec;8(6):770-5. doi: 10.1111/cts.12322. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
10
Flawed Self-Assessment: Implications for Health, Education, and the Workplace.
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2004 Dec;5(3):69-106. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00018.x. Epub 2004 Dec 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验