• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究目标结构化临床考试(R-OSCE):一种评估临床和转化研究能力的创新工具。

The Research Objective Structured Clinical Exam (R-OSCE): An Innovative Tool to Assess Clinical and Translational Research Competencies.

作者信息

Ianni Phillip A, Eakin Brenda L, Samuels Elias M, Champagne Ellen, Ellingrod Vicki L

机构信息

University of Michigan.

出版信息

MedEdPublish (2016). 2021 Sep 3;10:143. doi: 10.15694/mep.2021.000143.2. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.15694/mep.2021.000143.2
PMID:38486548
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10939553/
Abstract

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. Introduction The Research Objective Structured Clinical Exam (R-OSCE) described in this paper was designed as part of a comprehensive program to assess competency in specific domains of clinical and translational research (CTR) for students enrolled in a 12-week introductory summer research program. Methods The program curriculum was mapped to core competencies developed by the National Center for Translational Science (NCATS) and used to develop R-OSCE stations. Twelve stations were developed, with five administered during orientation as a practice test and seven administered post-program. A scoring rubric using an anchored scale of 1-5 was developed and six qualified raters were trained in its use. The exam was self-paced and delivered through a secure online computer-based platform. Results Forty-seven students (three cohorts) completed the post-program R-OSCE. Most respondents scored at 3 (developing competence) or higher on most stations for both the practice and post-program exams, the exceptions being the stations involving writing research questions and engaging communities in research. Students indicated they liked demonstrating CTR skills through the R-OSCE. Most participants agreed that exam tasks were related to stated program competencies and that stations were realistic. Discussion The R-OSCE is best used as part of a comprehensive assessment program and may be useful in providing formative feedback to trainees that they can share with their mentors. Additionally, this study demonstrated that it could feasibly be used to evaluate the effectiveness of research education programs. However, additional time was needed to train raters and score the R-OSCE. Modifications were made to administer the exam through use of an online format with a modest budget. The computer-based format provides a solution to the current need for assessments that can be administered remotely.

摘要

本文已迁移。该文章被标记为推荐文章。引言 本文所述的研究目标结构化临床考试(R-OSCE)是作为一个综合项目的一部分而设计的,该项目旨在评估参加为期12周夏季基础研究项目的学生在临床和转化研究(CTR)特定领域的能力。方法 该项目课程与美国国家转化科学中心(NCATS)制定的核心能力进行了映射,并用于开发R-OSCE站点。共开发了12个站点,其中5个在迎新期间作为实践测试进行,7个在项目结束后进行。制定了一个使用1-5锚定量表的评分标准,并对6名合格评分员进行了使用培训。考试为自主节奏,通过安全的基于计算机的在线平台进行。结果 47名学生(三个队列)完成了项目结束后的R-OSCE。在实践考试和项目结束后考试的大多数站点上,大多数受访者的得分在3分(发展中能力)或更高,涉及撰写研究问题和让社区参与研究的站点除外。学生们表示他们喜欢通过R-OSCE展示CTR技能。大多数参与者同意考试任务与所述项目能力相关,并且站点是现实的。讨论 R-OSCE最好作为综合评估项目的一部分使用,可能有助于为学员提供可与导师分享的形成性反馈。此外,本研究表明它可切实用于评估研究教育项目的有效性。然而,需要额外的时间来培训评分员和对R-OSCE进行评分。通过使用在线形式并以适度预算进行考试管理进行了修改。基于计算机的形式为当前对可远程进行的评估的需求提供了解决方案。

相似文献

1
The Research Objective Structured Clinical Exam (R-OSCE): An Innovative Tool to Assess Clinical and Translational Research Competencies.研究目标结构化临床考试(R-OSCE):一种评估临床和转化研究能力的创新工具。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2021 Sep 3;10:143. doi: 10.15694/mep.2021.000143.2. eCollection 2021.
2
Development and evaluation of a spiral model of assessing EBM competency using OSCEs in undergraduate medical education.运用 OSCE 评估本科医学教育中循证医学能力的螺旋式模型的开发与评估。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Apr 10;21(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02650-7.
3
Implementing an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in dental education: effects on students' learning strategies.在牙科教育中实施客观结构化临床考试(OSCE):对学生学习策略的影响。
Eur J Dent Educ. 2006 Nov;10(4):226-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2006.00421.x.
4
Evolving to Objective Structured Clinical Exams (OSCE): Transitional experience in an undergraduate pharmacy program in Kuwait.向客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)的转变:科威特一个本科药学项目的过渡经验。
Saudi Pharm J. 2021 Jan;29(1):104-113. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2020.12.013. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
5
Medical students' perception of objective structured clinical examination: a feedback for process improvement.医学生对客观结构化临床考试的认知:用于改进流程的反馈
J Surg Educ. 2014 Sep-Oct;71(5):701-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.02.010. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
6
An objective structured clinical exam to measure intrinsic CanMEDS roles.一项用于测量内在CanMEDS角色的客观结构化临床考试。
Med Educ Online. 2016 Sep 15;21:31085. doi: 10.3402/meo.v21.31085. eCollection 2016.
7
The predictors of nursing students' clinical competency in pre-internship objective structured clinical examination: The roles of exam anxiety and academic success.护生实习前客观结构化临床考试临床能力的预测因素:考试焦虑和学业成功的作用。
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Dec;107:105148. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105148. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
8
Assessing the utility of virtual OSCE sessions as an educational tool: a national pilot study.评估虚拟客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)在教育工具方面的效用:全国试点研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Mar 15;22(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03248-3.
9
Objective structured clinical examination as a competency assessment tool of students' readiness for advanced pharmacy practice experiences in South Korea: a pilot study.客观结构化临床考试作为评估韩国学生准备高级药学实践经验能力的工具:一项试点研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Apr 12;23(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04226-z.
10
Digitizing Scoring Systems With Extended Online Feedback: A Novel Approach to Interactive Teaching and Learning in Formative OSCE.通过扩展在线反馈实现评分系统数字化:形成性客观结构化临床考试中交互式教学与学习的新方法。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jan 25;8:762810. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.762810. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Reimagining a summer research program during COVID: Strategies for enhancing research workforce diversity.重新构想新冠疫情期间的暑期研究项目:增强研究人员队伍多样性的策略
J Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Feb 28;6(1):e37. doi: 10.1017/cts.2022.371. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Conducting a high-stakes OSCE in a COVID-19 environment.在新冠疫情环境下开展高风险客观结构化临床考试。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2020 Mar 27;9:54. doi: 10.15694/mep.2020.000054.1. eCollection 2020.
2
The Fundamental Characteristics of a Translational Scientist.转化医学科学家的基本特征。
ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci. 2019 May 2;2(3):213-216. doi: 10.1021/acsptsci.9b00022. eCollection 2019 Jun 14.
3
Indices of Clinical Research Coordinators' Competence.临床研究协调员能力指标。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2019 Jun;3(2-3):75-81. doi: 10.1017/cts.2019.381. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
4
Assessing an assessment: The review and redesign of a competency-based mid-degree evaluation.评估一项评估:基于能力的中等学位评估的审查与重新设计
J Clin Transl Sci. 2018 Aug;2(4):223-227. doi: 10.1017/cts.2018.321. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
5
Does an Objective Structured Clinical Examination Fit Your Assessment Toolbox?客观结构化临床考试适合你的评估工具箱吗?
J Grad Med Educ. 2017 Dec;9(6):771-772. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-17-00655.1.
6
Do coursework summative assessments predict clinical performance? A systematic review.课程总结性评估能否预测临床能力?一项系统评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Feb 16;17(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0878-3.
7
Family medicine resident OSCEs: a systematic review.家庭医学住院医师客观结构化临床考试:一项系统评价。
Educ Prim Care. 2016 Nov;27(6):471-477. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2016.1205835. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
8
Assessing Communication Skills of Medical Students in Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCE)--A Systematic Review of Rating Scales.在客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)中评估医学生的沟通技巧——评分量表的系统评价
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 31;11(3):e0152717. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152717. eCollection 2016.
9
Assessing Competencies in a Master of Science in Clinical Research Program: The Comprehensive Competency Review.评估临床研究项目理学硕士的能力:综合能力审查
Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Dec;8(6):770-5. doi: 10.1111/cts.12322. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
10
Flawed Self-Assessment: Implications for Health, Education, and the Workplace.有缺陷的自我评估:对健康、教育和工作场所的影响。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2004 Dec;5(3):69-106. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00018.x. Epub 2004 Dec 1.