School of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610075, China; Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610072, China.
Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610072, China.
Phytomedicine. 2024 May;127:155487. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2024.155487. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
To extend and form the "Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation in Traditional Chinese Medicine" (GRADE-TCM).
Methodologies were systematically reviewed and analyzed concerning evidence-based TCM guidelines worldwide. A survey questionnaire was developed based on the literature review and open-end expert interviews. Then, we performed expert consensus, discussion meeting, opinion collection, external examination, and the GRADE-TCM was formed eventually.
265 Chinese and English TCM guidelines were included and analyzed. Five experts completed the open-end interviews. Ten methodological entries were summarized, screened and selected. One round of consensus was conducted, including a total of 22 experts and 220 valid questionnaire entries, concerning 1) selection of the GRADE, 2) GRADE-TCM upgrading criteria, 3) GRADE-TCM evaluation standard, 4) principles of consensus and recommendation, and 5) presentation of the GRADE-TCM and recommendation. Finally, consensus was reached on the above 10 entries, and the results were of high importance (with voting percentages ranging from 50 % to 81.82 % for "very important" rating) and strong reliability (with the Cr ranging from 0.93 to 0.99). Expert discussion meeting (with 40 experts), opinion collection (in two online platforms) and external examination (with 14 third-party experts) were conducted, and the GRADE-TCM was established eventually.
GRADE-TCM provides a new extended evidence-based evaluation standard for TCM guidelines. In GRADE-TCM, international evidence-based norms, characteristics of TCM intervention, and inheritance of TCM culture were combined organically and followed. This is helpful for localization of the GRADE in TCM and internationalization of TCM guidelines.
扩展并形成《中医药证据分级评价(GRADE)》。
系统回顾和分析了全球基于循证的中医药指南方法学。根据文献回顾和开放式专家访谈开发了调查问卷。然后,我们进行了专家共识、讨论会议、意见收集、外部审查,最终形成了 GRADE-TCM。
共纳入并分析了 265 篇中英文中医药指南。完成了 5 位专家的开放式访谈。总结、筛选和选择了 10 项方法学条目。进行了一轮共识,共有 22 位专家和 220 份有效问卷,涉及 1)GRADE 的选择,2)GRADE-TCM 升级标准,3)GRADE-TCM 评价标准,4)共识和推荐原则,5)GRADE-TCM 和推荐意见的呈现。最终,上述 10 个条目达成共识,结果非常重要(“非常重要”评级的投票百分比为 50%至 81.82%),可靠性强(Cr 值为 0.93 至 0.99)。进行了专家讨论会议(40 位专家)、意见收集(两个在线平台)和外部审查(14 位第三方专家),最终建立了 GRADE-TCM。
GRADE-TCM 为中医药指南提供了一个新的扩展的基于证据的评价标准。在 GRADE-TCM 中,国际循证规范、中医药干预特点和中医药文化传承有机结合,遵循 GRADE-TCM。这有助于 GRADE 在中医药中的本地化和中医药指南的国际化。