Division Health and Performance, Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Building 9B, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Department of Movement and Training Science, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Institute of Sports Science, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany.
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 15;14(1):6278. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56560-x.
Concerns are repeatedly raised about possible adverse respiratory effects of wearing filtering face pieces (FFP) during physical activity. This study compared the impact of FFP type 2 (NF95) on pulmonary function, blood gas values, metabolism and discomfort during light, moderate and vigorous physical activity. Healthy adults (n = 13; 6 females, 7 males; mean 31.3, SD 5.5 years) participated in this randomized two-armed (Ergometer cycling with a FFP type 2 vs. no mask) crossover trial. Baseline cardiopulmonary exercise testing and two interventions (masked and unmasked ergometer cycling 40%, 50% and 70% VO2max, 10 min each) were separated by 48 h washout periods. Spiroergometric data (End tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure PetCO; breathing frequency; inspiration time), blood gas analysis outcomes (capillary carbon dioxide partial pressure, pCO) and subjective response (Breathing effort and perceived exertion) were contrasted between conditions using ANOVAs. All participants completed the crossover trial, seven started with the FFP2 condition (No adverse events or side effects). FFP2 decreased breathing frequency, prolonged inspiration time, increased perceived breathing effort and PetCO (p < .05). Blood pCO in millimetres mercury increased during exercise with 50%VO2max (mean 36.67, SD 3.19 vs. mean 38.46, SD 2.57; p < .05) and 70%VO2max (35.04, 2.84 vs. 38.17, 3.43; p < .05) but not during exercise with 40%VO2max (36.55, 2.73 vs. 38.70). Perceived exertion was not affected (p > 0.05) by mask wearing. Conclusion: Mask-induced breathing resistance decreased respiratory performance and limited pulmonary gas exchange. While FFP2 affected subjective breathing effort per se, invasive diagnostics showed that statistically significant metabolic effects are induced from moderate intensity upwards. Trial registration: DRKS-ID: DRKS00030181, Date of registration: 05/09/2022 (German Register for Clinical Trials).
人们反复担心在进行体育活动时佩戴过滤面罩(FFP)可能会对呼吸产生不良影响。本研究比较了 FFP 类型 2(NF95)在轻度、中度和剧烈体育活动期间对肺功能、血气值、代谢和不适的影响。健康成年人(n=13;6 名女性,7 名男性;平均 31.3,SD 5.5 岁)参加了这项随机双臂(带 FFP 类型 2 的测力计自行车运动与不戴口罩)交叉试验。在 48 小时洗脱期之间进行了基线心肺运动测试和两项干预措施(面罩和不戴口罩的测力计自行车运动 40%、50%和 70%VO2max,每次 10 分钟)。使用方差分析对比了条件之间的呼吸测量数据(呼气末二氧化碳分压 PetCO;呼吸频率;吸气时间)、血气分析结果(毛细血管二氧化碳分压,pCO)和主观反应(呼吸努力和感知用力)。所有参与者都完成了交叉试验,其中 7 名参与者首先进行了 FFP2 条件(无不良事件或副作用)。FFP2 降低了呼吸频率、延长了吸气时间、增加了感知呼吸费力和 PetCO(p<.05)。在 50%VO2max 运动时(平均 36.67,SD 3.19 与平均 38.46,SD 2.57;p<.05)和 70%VO2max 运动时(35.04,2.84 与 38.17,3.43;p<.05),血液中的 pCO 会增加,但在 40%VO2max 运动时不会(36.55,2.73 与 38.70)。佩戴口罩并没有影响(p>.05)感知用力。结论:面罩引起的呼吸阻力降低了呼吸性能并限制了肺气体交换。虽然 FFP2 本身会影响主观呼吸用力,但侵入性诊断显示,从中等到高强度运动开始会引起统计学上显著的代谢效应。试验注册:DRKS-ID:DRKS00030181,注册日期:2022 年 09 月 05 日(德国临床试验注册处)。