Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA; David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
School of Nursing, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024 May;25(5):925-931.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.02.003. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
To evaluate the impact of a mentoring program to encourage staff-delivered sleep-promoting strategies on sleep, function, depression, and anxiety among skilled nursing facility (SNF) residents.
Modified stepped-wedge unit-level intervention.
Seventy-two residents (mean age 75 ± 15 years; 61.5% female, 41% non-Hispanic white, 35% Black, 20% Hispanic, 3% Asian) of 2 New York City urban SNFs.
Expert mentors provided SNF staff webinars, in-person workshops, and weekly sleep pearls via text messaging. Resident data were collected at baseline, post-intervention (V), and 3-month follow-up (V), including wrist actigraphy, resident behavioral observations, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) depression scale, Brief Anxiety and Depression Scale (BADS), Brief Cognitive Assessment Tool (BCAT), and select Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS 3.0) measures. Linear mixed models were fit for continuous outcomes and mixed-effects logistic models for binary outcomes. Outcomes were modeled as a function of time. Planned contrasts compared baseline to V and V.
There was significant improvement in PSQI scores from baseline to V (P = .009), and from baseline to V (P = .008). Other significant changes between baseline and V included decreased depression (PHQ-9) (P = .028), increased daytime observed out of bed (P ≤ .001), and increased daytime observed being awake (P < .001). At V (vs baseline) being observed out of bed decreased (P < .001). Daytime sleeping by actigraphy increased from baseline to V (P = .004), but not V. MDS 3.0 activities of daily living and pain showed improvements by the second quarter following implementation of SLUMBER (P's ≤ .034). There were no significant changes in BADS or BCAT between baseline and V or V.
SNF residents had improvements in sleep quality and depression with intervention, but improvements were not sustained at 3-month follow-up. The COVID-19 pandemic led to premature study termination, so full impacts remain unknown.
评估一项导师计划对鼓励员工提供促进睡眠策略对熟练护理机构(SNF)居民睡眠、功能、抑郁和焦虑的影响。
改良的阶梯式单位水平干预。
2 家纽约市城市 SNF 的 72 名居民(平均年龄 75 ± 15 岁;61.5%为女性,41%为非西班牙裔白人,35%为黑人,20%为西班牙裔,3%为亚洲人)。
专家导师通过网络研讨会、面对面研讨会和每周通过短信提供睡眠珍珠,为 SNF 工作人员提供服务。在基线、干预后(V)和 3 个月随访(V)时收集居民数据,包括腕部活动记录仪、居民行为观察、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)、患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)抑郁量表、简要焦虑和抑郁量表(BADS)、简要认知评估工具(BCAT)和选择最小数据集合 3.0(MDS 3.0)测量。对连续结果进行线性混合模型拟合,对二项结果进行混合效应逻辑模型拟合。结果作为时间的函数进行建模。计划对比将基线与 V 和 V 进行比较。
PSQI 评分从基线到 V(P=.009)和从基线到 V(P=.008)显著改善。基线到 V 之间的其他显著变化包括抑郁(PHQ-9)降低(P=.028)、白天观察到的起床次数增加(P ≤.001)和白天观察到的清醒时间增加(P <.001)。V 时(与基线相比)起床次数减少(P <.001)。白天通过活动记录仪观察到的睡眠时间从基线到 V 增加(P=.004),但 V 时没有增加。实施 SLUMBER 后第二个季度 MDS 3.0 的日常生活活动和疼痛显示出改善(P's ≤.034)。基线到 V 或 V 时 BADS 或 BCAT 没有显著变化。
SNF 居民的睡眠质量和抑郁状况随着干预措施而改善,但在 3 个月随访时并未持续改善。COVID-19 大流行导致研究提前终止,因此完整的影响仍不清楚。