Kuhnt Mathias, Müßig Peter, Reitz Tilman
Laboratory for Research in Organization and Differentiation, Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Science, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
Research Infrastructure and Methods, German Centre for Higher Education Research and Science Studies (DZHW), Hannover, Germany.
Front Res Metr Anal. 2024 Mar 1;9:1301354. doi: 10.3389/frma.2024.1301354. eCollection 2024.
The German system of higher education and public research is characterized by a high rate of temporary contracts with short contract durations and a nearly complete absence of structured career options. About 82% of employees not holding a full professorship have fixed-term contracts, with an average contract period of 20 months. This is facilitated by a special fixed-term employment law (Wissenschaftszeitvertragsgesetz) which universities and other public research institutions have stretched to its limits. Against the background of a survey which we conducted in 2021 and whose results once more demonstrate the shortcomings of this system, we discuss alternative options in the form of model calculations. We propose a reform of employment structures and career paths that could improve not only personal working conditions but also ensure the quality of research and teaching in German academia. By quantitative comparison with the current employment situation, our model calculation demonstrates that plannable career decisions can be enabled at an early stage without changing budgets or teaching duties. We also show that the counter argument of a "congestion" of positions is not substantiated, and that young scholars will still have the opportunity to start a career in the reformed system, while the total number of employees can be kept nearly constant.
德国的高等教育和公共研究体系的特点是临时合同比例高、合同期限短,且几乎完全缺乏结构化的职业发展路径。约82%未担任正教授的员工签订的是定期合同,平均合同期为20个月。这得益于一项特殊的定期雇佣法(《科研时间合同法》),大学和其他公共研究机构已将其运用到了极致。在我们于2021年进行的一项调查的背景下,其结果再次证明了该体系的缺陷,我们以模型计算的形式讨论了替代方案。我们提议对就业结构和职业发展路径进行改革,这不仅可以改善个人工作条件,还能确保德国学术界的研究和教学质量。通过与当前就业情况的定量比较,我们的模型计算表明,在不改变预算或教学任务的情况下,可以在早期实现可规划的职业决策。我们还表明,关于职位“拥堵”的反对论点没有事实依据,并且年轻学者在改革后的体系中仍将有机会开启职业生涯,而员工总数可以保持基本不变。