Clinical Performance of Cas13a-based Point-of-Care Lateral Flow Assay for Detecting .

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of is dependent on nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT), which is not available in resource-limited settings where the prevalence of infection is highest. Recent advances in molecular diagnostics leveraging the high specificity of CRISPR enzymes can permit field-deployable, point-of-care lateral flow assays. We previously reported on the development and performance of a lateral flow assay for detecting . Here we aimed to pair that assay with point-of-care DNA extraction techniques and assess the performance on clinical urine specimens.

METHODS

We collected an additional urine specimen among individuals enrolling in an ongoing clinical trial at the Massachusetts General Hospital Sexual Health Clinic who presented with symptoms of urethritis or cervicitis (urethral or vaginal discharge, dysuria, or dyspareunia). We then assessed thermal, detergent, and combination DNA extraction conditions, varying the duration of heat at 95°C and concentration of Triton X. We assessed the efficacy of the various DNA extraction methods by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). Once an extraction method was selected, we incubated samples for 90 minutes to permit isothermal recombinase polymerase amplification. We then assessed the performance of lateral flow Cas13a-based detection using our previously designed A probe and primer system for detection, comparing lateral flow results with NAAT results from clinical care.

RESULTS

We assessed DNA extraction conditions on 3 clinical urine specimens. There was no consistent significant difference in copies per microliter of DNA obtained using more or less heat. On average, we noted that 0.02% triton combined with 5 minutes of heating to 95°C resulted in the highest DNA yield, however, 0.02% triton alone resulted in a quantity of DNA that was above the previously determined analytic sensitivity of the assay. Given that detergent-based extraction is more easily deployable, we selected that as our method for extraction. We treated 23 clinical specimens with 0.02% triton, which we added to the Cas13a detection system. We ran all lateral flow detections in duplicate. The Cas13a-based assay detected 8 of 8 (100%) positive specimens, and 0 of 15 negative specimens.

CONCLUSION

Using point-of-care DNA extraction, isothermal amplification, and Cas13a-based detection, our point-of-care lateral flow assay correctly identified 23 clinical urine specimens as either positive or negative. Further evaluation of this assay among larger samples and more diverse sample types is warranted.