The Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (A.N.K., G.H.L.T., S.K., M.V., M.B., S.G., A.H., L.S., S.L., G.D.D., S.K.S., A.S.K., P.K.).
Department of Cardiology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia (A.N.K.).
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Mar;17(3):e013766. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013766. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
Redo-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) can pin the index transcatheter heart valve leaflets open leading to sinus sequestration and restricting coronary access. The impact of initial implant depth and commissural alignment on redo-TAVR feasibility is unclear. We sought to determine the feasibility of redo-TAVR and coronary access after SAPIEN 3 (S3) TAVR stratified by implant depth and commissural alignment.
Consecutive patients with native valve aortic stenosis were evaluated using multidetector computed tomography. S3 TAVR simulations were done at 3 implant depths, sizing per manufacturer recommendation and assuming nominal expansion in all cases. Redo-TAVR was deemed unfeasible based on valve-to-sinotubular junction distance and valve-to-sinus height <2 mm, while the neoskirt plane of the S3 transcatheter heart valve estimated coronary access feasibility.
Overall, 1900 patients (mean age, 80.2±8 years; STS-PROM [Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Operative Mortality], 3.4%) were included. Redo-TAVR feasibility reduced significantly at shallower initial S3 implant depths (2.3% at 80:20 versus 27.5% at 100:0, <0.001). Larger S3 sizes reduced redo-TAVR feasibility, but only in patients with a 100:0 implant (<0.001). Commissural alignment would render redo-TAVR feasible in all patients, assuming the utilization of leaflet modification techniques to reduce the neoskirt height. Coronary access following TAV-in-TAV was affected by both index S3 implant depth and size.
This study highlights the critical impact of implant depth, commissural alignment, and transcatheter heart valve size in predicting redo-TAVR feasibility. These findings highlight the necessity for individualized preprocedural planning, considering both immediate results and long-term prospects for reintervention as TAVR is increasingly utilized in younger patients with aortic stenosis.
经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后再次手术可能会导致索引经导管心脏瓣膜瓣叶张开,导致窦隔离并限制冠状动脉进入。初始植入深度和连合对准对再次 TAVR 可行性的影响尚不清楚。我们旨在通过 SAPIEN 3(S3)TAVR 后根据植入深度和连合对准来确定再次 TAVR 和冠状动脉进入的可行性。
连续评估患有原生瓣膜主动脉狭窄的患者使用多探测器计算机断层扫描。在 3 种植入深度下进行 S3 TAVR 模拟,根据制造商的建议进行尺寸调整,并假设所有情况下的标称扩张。根据瓣环至窦管交界处的距离和瓣环至窦高度<2mm,将再次 TAVR 视为不可行,而 S3 经导管心脏瓣膜的新裙边平面估计了冠状动脉进入的可行性。
总体而言,1900 例患者(平均年龄,80.2±8 岁;STS-PROM[胸外科医师协会预测的手术死亡率],3.4%)被纳入。初始 S3 植入深度较浅时,再次 TAVR 的可行性显著降低(80:20 时为 2.3%,100:0 时为 27.5%,<0.001)。较大的 S3 尺寸会降低再次 TAVR 的可行性,但仅限于植入 100:0 的患者(<0.001)。只要使用瓣叶修正技术来降低新裙边高度,连合对准将使所有患者再次可行 TAVR。TAV-in-TAV 后冠状动脉进入受到索引 S3 植入深度和尺寸的影响。
本研究强调了植入深度、连合对准和经导管心脏瓣膜尺寸在预测再次 TAVR 可行性方面的关键影响。这些发现强调了个体化术前规划的必要性,既要考虑即刻结果,也要考虑 TAVR 在主动脉瓣狭窄的年轻患者中越来越多地使用的长期再干预前景。