Department of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Asian J Psychiatr. 2024 May;95:104000. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2024.104000. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
Dissociative disorder patients often present with sudden and embarrassing symptoms, and it is difficult for the patient and care giver to understand initially, recognize the need for help and reach for appropriate treatment timely. This can result in high risk of engaging in dangerous behaviors such as self-harm and suicidal acts, impaired global functioning, and poor quality of life. Knowledge about the types of barriers which are there in treatment seeking, can help in planning strategies for their removal and to facilitate the treatment process.
Cross-sectional study among patients (n=133) with Dissociative disorders which were recruited from January 2023 to June 2023 in a tertiary care hospital. Pathways to care and barriers in treatment for Dissociative disorders were assessed by interviewing patients using semi-structured proforma. The Dissociative Experience Scale and World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0)) were used to assess disease severity and impact of illness on various domains of life respectively. Group comparison was made to assess differences in social- clinical profile of patients choosing different modalities of treatment.
133 patients of Dissociative disorders with mean age 29.6±9.2, showed their first-choice of help seeking from general practitioner/ neurologist (40.6%), traditional faith healers (35.3%), psychiatrist (18.1%) and 5.2% preferred alternative treatments. This trend changed with 2nd and 3rd contact of help seeking with greater preference for psychiatrist in their 2nd (n=45, 33.8%) and 3rd (n=69, 51.8%) contact. The median duration of untreated illness was 56 weeks (IQR 24-182 weeks). Social-clinical profile of patients varied with their choice of treatment, having lower education level (P = 0.013), longer duration of untreated illness (p=0.003), more severity of symptoms (p=0.032) and greater disability scores(p=0.002) in patients whose first treatment choice was traditional faith healers. More than 70% patients faced availability barriers, stigma, unawareness about mental illness and influence of others in treatment of choice as barriers in initiating and continuing treatment.
Patients with Dissociative disorders seek treatment from a multitude of healthcare providers including traditional faith healers, general physicians, and alternative medicine practitioners before reaching psychiatrist and undergoes various barriers in treatment. There is need to implement necessary measures for sensitization and awareness about Dissociative disorders to prevent prolonged and undue delays in initiation of appropriate management.
分离性障碍患者常出现突然且令人尴尬的症状,患者和护理人员最初难以理解,认识到需要帮助并及时寻求适当的治疗。这可能导致从事危险行为(如自残和自杀行为)、整体功能受损和生活质量下降的风险增加。了解治疗过程中存在的各种障碍类型有助于制定消除障碍的策略并促进治疗过程。
本横断面研究于 2023 年 1 月至 6 月在一家三级护理医院招募了 133 名分离性障碍患者。通过使用半结构化方案对患者进行访谈,评估分离性障碍患者的治疗途径和治疗障碍。使用分离体验量表和世界卫生组织残疾评估量表 2.0(WHODAS 2.0)分别评估疾病严重程度和疾病对生活各领域的影响。对不同治疗模式选择的患者的社会临床特征进行组间比较,以评估其差异。
133 名分离性障碍患者的平均年龄为 29.6±9.2 岁,他们的首选求助对象为全科医生/神经科医生(40.6%)、传统信仰治疗师(35.3%)、精神科医生(18.1%)和 5.2%的患者选择替代疗法。这种趋势在寻求第二次和第三次帮助时发生了变化,第二次(n=45,33.8%)和第三次(n=69,51.8%)求助时更倾向于选择精神科医生。未治疗疾病的中位时间为 56 周(IQR 24-182 周)。患者的社会临床特征因治疗选择而异,选择传统信仰治疗师作为首次治疗的患者受教育程度较低(P=0.013)、未治疗时间较长(p=0.003)、症状严重程度较高(p=0.032)和残疾评分较高(p=0.002)。超过 70%的患者在开始和继续治疗时面临可及性障碍、耻辱感、对精神疾病的认识不足以及他人的影响等障碍。
分离性障碍患者在寻求精神科医生治疗之前,会从众多医疗保健提供者(包括传统信仰治疗师、全科医生和替代医学从业者)那里接受治疗,并在治疗过程中遇到各种障碍。需要采取必要措施,提高对分离性障碍的认识和敏感性,以防止适当管理的开始出现不必要的长时间延迟。