Du Meijiao, Li Hongkai, Guo Huijuan, Zhang Xiaowen, Rong Hongguo, Hao Xuezeng
School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China.
Clinical Medical College of China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 100029, China.
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 8;10(6):e27293. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27293. eCollection 2024 Mar 30.
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been a global pandemic since it broke out, and integrated Chinese and Western medicine (ICWM) has played an important role in the prevention and treatment of COVID-19. We aimed to analyze the published literature on ICWM for COVID-19 at home and abroad, and compare their differences on hotspots and research fronts.
Publications before Oct 31, 2022 were retrieved from the Web of Science core database (WOS), PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure database (CNKI), Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform (Wanfang), China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), China Biology Medicine disc (CBM), CiteSpace and VOSviewer to summarize the basic characteristics of publications, countries, institutions, keywords, and citations.
We included 580 English papers and 1727 Chinese papers in this study. The development trends in China and other countries are relatively asynchronous and show a smooth growth trend for the future. The most productive countries were China, India, and the United States, while the most productive domestic research institution was the Beijing University of Chinese Medicine. The clustering analysis of high-frequency keywords showed that Chinese literature focused on clinical studies of ICWM for COVID-19, such as retrospective studies, clinical features, and traditional Chinese medicine syndrome analysis, while English literature focused on therapeutic mechanism studies and evidence-based medicine studies, such as systematic reviews and meta-analysis, and both of them paid attention to network pharmacological research and . Sorting out the top 10 highly cited articles, Huang CL's article published in Lancet in 2020 was regarded as a cornerstone in the field.
The treatment of COVID-19 by ICWM has become a worldwide research hotspot. Although there are differences in the specific contents among countries, the development trend of research types to the mechanism of action, and the development trend of research contents to the recovery period treatment and the prevention of COVID-19 by ICWM are consistent.
自2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)爆发以来,它已成为全球大流行疾病,中西医结合在COVID-19的预防和治疗中发挥了重要作用。我们旨在分析国内外已发表的关于中西医结合治疗COVID-19的文献,并比较它们在热点和研究前沿方面的差异。
从Web of Science核心数据库(WOS)、PubMed、中国知网数据库(CNKI)、万方数据知识服务平台(万方)、维普中文科技期刊数据库(VIP)、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、CiteSpace和VOSviewer中检索2022年10月31日前发表的文献,以总结文献的基本特征、国家、机构、关键词和被引频次。
本研究纳入580篇英文论文和1727篇中文论文。中国和其他国家的发展趋势相对不同步,未来呈平稳增长趋势。发文量最多的国家是中国、印度和美国,国内发文量最多的研究机构是北京中医药大学。高频关键词聚类分析表明,中文文献侧重于COVID-19中西医结合的临床研究,如回顾性研究、临床特征和中医证候分析,而英文文献侧重于治疗机制研究和循证医学研究,如系统评价和Meta分析,两者都关注网络药理学研究。梳理出被引频次排名前十的文章,2020年黄春林发表在《柳叶刀》上的文章被视为该领域的基石。
中西医结合治疗COVID-19已成为全球研究热点。各国在具体内容上虽存在差异,但研究类型向作用机制发展的趋势,以及研究内容向COVID-19恢复期治疗和预防发展的趋势是一致的。