Ahmed Syed Shabbir, Samad Khalid, Yousuf Muhammad S, Qamar-Ul-Hoda Muhammad
Anaesthesiology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, PAK.
Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, PAK.
Cureus. 2024 Feb 19;16(2):e54499. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54499. eCollection 2024 Feb.
The objective of our study is to compare the success rate, duration, and incidence of complications of a right internal jugular vein (IJV) cannulation by using three different techniques.
A randomised controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary care teaching hospital. A total of 201 patients were randomly allocated to one of the following three groups (67 in each group). Techniques were categorised as anatomical landmark technique group (Group ALT), ultrasound guided pre-location group (Group USG-Pre), and real-time ultrasound-guided technique group (Group USG-RT).
Central venous catheter insertion via three techniques.
In 138 (73.01%) patients' IJV canulated in the first attempt, USG-RT, USG-Pre, and ALT were 51 (83.6%), 44 (72.1%), and 43 (64.2%), respectively. On the other hand, 37 (19.57%) patients were required in the second attempt, while only 14 (7.40%) patients were required in the third attempt for successful IJV cannulation. The success rates, as defined in our study, were only 138 (73%) as, in 51 (27%), we cannulated in more than a single attempt or switched to another technique. We found a significant difference in preparation time in all techniques as P-value <0.05, but no significant difference was found in venous access time, cannulation time, and duration of the procedure.
Any technique can be used for IJV cannulation, but the most acceptable is the real-time US technique. However, no difference in the overall procedure time among all three techniques was noted, and no major incidence of complication was found.
我们研究的目的是比较使用三种不同技术进行右颈内静脉(IJV)置管的成功率、持续时间和并发症发生率。
在一家三级护理教学医院进行了一项随机对照试验。总共201名患者被随机分配到以下三组之一(每组67名)。技术分为解剖标志技术组(ALT组)、超声引导预定位组(USG-Pre组)和实时超声引导技术组(USG-RT组)。
通过三种技术插入中心静脉导管。
138例(73.01%)患者首次尝试成功进行IJV置管,其中USG-RT组、USG-Pre组和ALT组分别为51例(83.6%)、44例(72.1%)和43例(64.2%)。另一方面,37例(19.57%)患者需要第二次尝试,而只有14例(7.40%)患者需要第三次尝试才能成功进行IJV置管。按照我们研究中的定义,成功率仅为138例(73%),因为有51例(27%)患者进行了不止一次尝试或改用了另一种技术。我们发现所有技术在准备时间上有显著差异,P值<0.05,但在静脉穿刺时间、置管时间和操作持续时间上没有显著差异。
任何技术都可用于IJV置管,但最可接受的是实时超声技术。然而,三种技术在总体操作时间上没有差异,也未发现主要并发症发生率。