• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以患者为中心的目标关怀表和临床沟通培训对急性医院中共享决策和结局的影响:一项前瞻性纵向干预研究。

Effect of a person-centred goals-of-care form and clinical communication training on shared decision-making and outcomes in an acute hospital: a prospective longitudinal interventional study.

机构信息

Intensive Care Department, University Hospital Geelong, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.

School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Intern Med J. 2024 Jul;54(7):1197-1204. doi: 10.1111/imj.16381. Epub 2024 Mar 23.

DOI:10.1111/imj.16381
PMID:38520171
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with a life-limiting illness (LLI) requiring hospitalisation have a high likelihood of deterioration and 12-month mortality. To avoid non-aligned care, we need to understand our patients' goals and values.

AIM

To describe the association between the implementation of a shared decision-making (SDM) programme and documentation of goals of care (GoC) for hospitalised patients with LLI.

METHODS

A prospective longitudinal interventional study of patients admitted to acute general medicine wards in an Australian tertiary hospital over 5 years was conducted. A SDM programme with a new GoC form, communication training and clinical support was implemented. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a documented person-centred GoC discussion (PCD). Clinical outcomes included hospital utilisation and 90-day mortality.

RESULTS

1343 patients were included. The proportion of patients with PCDs increased from 0% to 35.4% (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 2.38; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.01-2.82; P < 0.001). During this time, median hospital length of stay decreased from 8 days (interquartile range (IQR), 4-14) to 6 days (IQR, 3-11) (adjusted estimate effect, -0.38; 95% CI, -0.64 to -0.11; P = 0.005) and rapid response team activation from 28% to 13% (aOR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78-0.97; P value = 0.01). Documented treatment preference of high-dependency unit care decreased from 39.7% to 24.4% (aOR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.73-0.89; P value < 0.001), and ward-based care increased from 31.9% to 55.1% (aOR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.14-1.36; P value < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The implementation of a SDM programme was associated with increased documentation of person-centred GoC, changed patient treatment preference to lower intensity care and reduced hospital utilisation.

摘要

背景

患有危及生命的疾病(LLI)并需要住院的患者极有可能病情恶化和在 12 个月内死亡。为了避免护理方向不一致,我们需要了解患者的目标和价值观。

目的

描述实施共享决策(SDM)计划与记录患有危及生命的疾病的住院患者的护理目标(GoC)之间的关联。

方法

对澳大利亚一家三级医院急性普通医学病房住院患者进行了为期 5 年的前瞻性纵向干预研究。实施了 SDM 计划,包括新的 GoC 表格、沟通培训和临床支持。主要结果是记录有以患者为中心的 GoC 讨论(PCD)的患者比例。临床结果包括住院利用和 90 天死亡率。

结果

共纳入 1343 例患者。有 PCD 的患者比例从 0%增加到 35.4%(调整后的优势比(aOR),2.38;95%置信区间(CI),2.01-2.82;P<0.001)。在此期间,中位住院时间从 8 天(四分位距(IQR),4-14)减少到 6 天(IQR,3-11)(调整后估计效果,-0.38;95%CI,-0.64 至-0.11;P=0.005),快速反应团队的激活率从 28%降至 13%(aOR,0.87;95%CI,0.78-0.97;P 值=0.01)。记录的高依赖单位护理治疗偏好从 39.7%降至 24.4%(aOR,0.81;95%CI,0.73-0.89;P 值<0.001),而基于病房的护理从 31.9%增加到 55.1%(aOR,1.24;95%CI,1.14-1.36;P 值<0.001)。

结论

实施 SDM 计划与记录以患者为中心的 GoC 增加、患者治疗偏好向低强度护理转变以及减少住院利用有关。

相似文献

1
Effect of a person-centred goals-of-care form and clinical communication training on shared decision-making and outcomes in an acute hospital: a prospective longitudinal interventional study.以患者为中心的目标关怀表和临床沟通培训对急性医院中共享决策和结局的影响:一项前瞻性纵向干预研究。
Intern Med J. 2024 Jul;54(7):1197-1204. doi: 10.1111/imj.16381. Epub 2024 Mar 23.
2
Early warning systems and rapid response systems for the prevention of patient deterioration on acute adult hospital wards.急性成人病房患者恶化的预防用早期预警系统和快速反应系统。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 22;11(11):CD005529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005529.pub3.
3
Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.心理健康问题患者的共同决策干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 11;11(11):CD007297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub3.
4
Consequences, costs and cost-effectiveness of workforce configurations in English acute hospitals.英国急症医院劳动力配置的后果、成本及成本效益
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul;13(25):1-107. doi: 10.3310/ZBAR9152.
5
Exercise for acutely hospitalised older medical patients.急性住院老年医学患者的运动治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 10;11(11):CD005955. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005955.pub3.
6
Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations.为医疗服务提供者提供的干预措施,以促进临床会诊中以患者为中心的方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD003267. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003267.pub2.
7
Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke: network meta-analysis.中风的有组织住院(中风单元)护理:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 23;4(4):CD000197. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000197.pub4.
8
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
9
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.哮喘患者的共同决策
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 3;10(10):CD012330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2.
10
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.

引用本文的文献

1
Three-Dimensional-Printed Models and Shared Decision-Making: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.三维打印模型与共同决策:一项整群随机临床试验
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2513187. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.13187.