Department of Nephrology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, 518020, Guangdong, China.
Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Kidney Diseases, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, 518055, Guangdong, China.
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Mar 23;19(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02624-y.
Iatrogenic complications of endovascular treatment for central venous stenosis have not yet been reported. Here we present a case of a patient on maintenance hemodialysis who developed catheter-related superior vena cava syndrome and subsequently suffered from hemorrhagic pericardial tamponade after undergoing percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting.
A 72-year-old male patient presented with uremia, and had been receiving maintenance hemodialysis for the past five years. The patient initially presented with dysfunction of the dialysis catheter (a cuffed tunneled double-lumen catheter in the right internal jugular vein). Imaging examination revealed a segmental occlusion of the superior vena cava stretching from the distal end of the dialysis catheter up to right atrium entrance, apparent compensatory dilatation of the azygos vein, and abundant subcutaneous collaterals. The patient underwent percutaneous transluminal balloon dilatation and stenting (covered stent) of the superior vena cava in the Cath Lab. During the procedure, with forceful advancement of the guidewire, it was observed to progress for a distance before a "smoke" appeared, and an outward spillage of contrast agent was visible, which suggested a possible vessel puncture leading into the mediastinum. Unfortunately, postoperative hemorrhagic pericardial tamponade occurred and the patient developed cardiogenic shock. He experienced symptoms included chest tightness and breath shortness with a recorded blood pressure of 84/60mmHg. After draining 600 ml of bloody fluid through pericardiocentesis, the patient's symptoms alleviated and his condition improved.
The case emphasizes the need for increased attention to iatrogenic endovascular injuries during catheter placement and endovascular treatment, such as causing pericardial hemorrhage leading to cardiac tamponade.
血管内治疗中心静脉狭窄的医源性并发症尚未见报道。本文报道了 1 例维持性血液透析患者,在经皮腔内血管成形术和支架置入术后发生导管相关上腔静脉综合征,并随后发生出血性心包填塞。
1 名 72 岁男性患者因尿毒症就诊,5 年来一直接受维持性血液透析。患者最初出现透析导管功能障碍(右侧颈内静脉带袖套隧道双腔导管)。影像学检查显示上腔静脉节段性闭塞,从透析导管的远端延伸至右心房入口,奇静脉明显代偿性扩张,皮下侧支丰富。患者在 Cath Lab 行经皮腔内球囊血管成形术和上腔静脉支架置入术(覆膜支架)。在手术过程中,当强力推进导丝时,导丝先前进了一段距离,然后出现“烟雾”,造影剂外溢,这表明可能发生了血管穿刺,导致造影剂进入纵隔。不幸的是,术后发生出血性心包填塞,患者发生心源性休克。患者出现胸闷、呼吸急促,记录血压为 84/60mmHg。经心包穿刺引流 600ml 血性液体后,患者症状缓解,病情改善。
该病例强调了在导管放置和血管内治疗过程中需要更加注意医源性血管内损伤,如导致心包积血引起的心包填塞。