Mazumder Nur-Us-Shafa, Lu Jingtian, Hall Andrew Stephen, Kasebi Arash, Girase Arjunsing, Masoud Farzaneh, Stull Jeffrey O, Ormond R Bryan
Textile Protection and Comfort Center, Wilson College of Textiles, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Illinois Fire Service Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA.
J Ind Text. 2023 Nov 30;53. doi: 10.1177/15280837231217401.
In 2022, the occupation of firefighting was categorized as a "Group 1" carcinogen, meaning it is known to be carcinogenic to humans. The personal protective equipment that structural firefighters wear is designed to safeguard them from thermal, physical, and chemical hazards while maintaining thermo-physiological comfort. Typically, the outer layer of structural turnout gear is finished with a durable water and oil-repellent (DWR) based on per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) that helps limit exposure to water and hazardous liquids. The PFAS-based aqueous emulsion typically used in DWR finishes is highly persistent and can cause various health problems if absorbed into the body through ingestion, inhalation, and/or dermal absorption. In response, the U.S. Fire Service has begun using non-PFAS water repellants in firefighter turnout gear. This study aims to evaluate the performance of both traditional PFAS-based and alternative non-PFAS outer shell materials. The study involved exposing both PFAS-based and non-PFAS DWR outer shell materials in turnout composites to simulated job exposures (i.e., weathering, thermal exposure, and laundering) that artificially aged the materials. After exposures, samples were evaluated for repellency, durability, thermal protection, and surface chemistry analysis to determine any potential performance trade-offs that may exist. Non-PFAS outer shell fabrics were found not to be diesel/oil-repellent, posing a potential flammability hazard if exposed to diesel and subsequent flame on an emergency response. Both PFAS-based and non-PFAS sets of fabrics performed similarly in terms of thermal protective performance, tearing strength, and water repellency. The surface analysis suggests that both PFAS and non-PFAS chemistries can degrade and shed from fabrics during the aging process. The study indicates that firefighters should be educated and trained regarding the potential performance trade-offs, such as oil absorption and flammability concerns when transitioning to non-PFAS outer shell materials.
2022年,消防职业被归类为“第1组”致癌物,这意味着已知其对人类具有致癌性。建筑消防员所穿的个人防护装备旨在保护他们免受热、物理和化学危害,同时保持热生理舒适度。通常,建筑用消防服的外层采用基于全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)的耐用拒水拒油(DWR)处理,这有助于减少与水和有害液体的接触。DWR整理中通常使用的基于PFAS的水性乳液具有高度持久性,如果通过摄入、吸入和/或皮肤吸收进入人体,可能会导致各种健康问题。作为回应,美国消防部门已开始在消防员消防服中使用非PFAS防水剂。本研究旨在评估传统的基于PFAS的外壳材料和替代的非PFAS外壳材料的性能。该研究包括将消防服复合材料中基于PFAS和非PFAS的DWR外壳材料暴露于模拟工作暴露(即风化、热暴露和洗涤)中,这些暴露会使材料人工老化。暴露后,对样品进行拒水性、耐久性、热防护和表面化学分析,以确定可能存在的任何潜在性能权衡。发现非PFAS外壳织物不具有拒柴油/拒油性能,如果在应急响应中暴露于柴油和随后的火焰中,可能会构成潜在的火灾危险。基于PFAS和非PFAS的两组织物在热防护性能、撕裂强度和拒水性方面表现相似。表面分析表明,PFAS和非PFAS化学物质在老化过程中都可能从织物上降解和脱落。该研究表明,应就潜在的性能权衡对消防员进行教育和培训,例如在过渡到非PFAS外壳材料时对吸油和易燃性的担忧。