Suppr超能文献

创伤外科东部协会对需要输血的创伤患者进行全血复苏:系统评价、荟萃分析和实践管理指南。

Whole blood resuscitation for injured patients requiring transfusion: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma.

机构信息

From the Divisions of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, and Burns, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery (J.P.M.), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine; Ryder Trauma Center (J.P.M.), Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, Florida; Department of Surgery (B.A.C.), McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston; Red Duke Trauma Institute (B.A.C.), Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas; Orlando Health Medical Group (R.A.L.), Orlando, Florida; Department of Surgery (L.M.K., A.M., C.A.), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Surgery (J.M.L.), University of California, Davis, Sacramento; United States Air Force (J.M.L.), Travis Air Force Base, California; Burnett School of Medicine (N.R., J.J.F.), Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, Texas; Brigham and Women's Hospital (J.G.); Department of Surgery (J.G.), Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Louis Calder Memorial Library (J.M.R.), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida; Department of Surgery (K.L.H.), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; and Inova Fairfax (G.K.), Falls Church, Virginia.

出版信息

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024 Sep 1;97(3):460-470. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004327. Epub 2024 Mar 27.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Whole blood (WB) resuscitation has reemerged as a resuscitation strategy for injured patients. However, the effect of WB-based resuscitation on outcomes has not been established. The primary objective of this guideline was to develop evidence-based recommendations on whether WB should be considered in civilian trauma patients receiving blood transfusions.

METHODS

An Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma working group performed a systematic review and meta-analysis using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. One Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes question was developed to analyze the effect of WB resuscitation in the acute phase on mortality, transfusion requirements, infectious complications, and intensive care unit length of stay. English language studies including adult civilian trauma patients comparing in-hospital WB to component therapy were included. Medline, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, CINAHL Plus, and Web of Science were queried. GRADEpro (McMaster University; Evidence Prime, Inc.; Ontario) was used to assess quality of evidence and risk of bias. The study was registered on International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42023451143).

RESULTS

A total of 21 studies were included. Most patients were severely injured and required blood transfusion, massive transfusion protocol activation, and/or a hemorrhage control procedure in the early phase of resuscitation. Mortality was assessed separately at the following intervals: early (i.e., emergency department, 3 hours, or 6 hours), 24 hours, late (i.e., 28 days or 30 days), and in-hospital. On meta-analysis, WB was not associated with decreased mortality. Whole blood was associated with decreased 4-hour red blood cell (mean difference, -1.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.12 to -0.52), 4-hour plasma (mean difference, -1.47; 95% CI, -2.94 to 0), and 24-hour red blood cell transfusions (mean difference, -1.22; 95% CI, -2.24 to -0.19) compared with component therapy. There were no differences in infectious complications or intensive care unit length of stay between groups.

CONCLUSION

We conditionally recommend WB resuscitation in adult civilian trauma patients receiving blood transfusions, recognizing that data are limited for certain populations, including women of childbearing age, and therefore this guideline may not apply to these populations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic Review/Meta-Analysis; Level III.

摘要

简介

全血(WB)复苏作为一种受伤患者的复苏策略重新出现。然而,WB 复苏对结果的影响尚未确定。本指南的主要目的是制定关于 WB 是否应在接受输血的平民创伤患者中考虑的循证建议。

方法

东部创伤外科学会工作组使用 Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation 方法进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。提出了一个人群、干预、比较和结局问题,以分析急性阶段 WB 复苏对死亡率、输血需求、感染并发症和重症监护病房住院时间的影响。纳入了比较院内 WB 与成分治疗的成人平民创伤患者的英语语言研究。检索了 Medline、Embase、Cochrane CENTRAL、CINAHL Plus 和 Web of Science。使用 GRADEpro(麦克马斯特大学;证据总理公司;安大略省)评估证据质量和偏倚风险。该研究在国际前瞻性系统评价注册中心(CRD42023451143)进行了注册。

结果

共纳入 21 项研究。大多数患者伤势严重,需要输血、大量输血方案激活和/或早期复苏时进行止血控制手术。死亡率分别在以下时间间隔进行评估:早期(即急诊科、3 小时或 6 小时)、24 小时、晚期(即 28 天或 30 天)和住院期间。荟萃分析显示,WB 与死亡率降低无关。与成分治疗相比,WB 与 4 小时红细胞(平均差异,-1.82;95%置信区间 [CI],-3.12 至 -0.52)、4 小时血浆(平均差异,-1.47;95% CI,-2.94 至 0)和 24 小时红细胞输血(平均差异,-1.22;95% CI,-2.24 至 -0.19)减少有关。两组间感染并发症或重症监护病房住院时间无差异。

结论

我们有条件地建议在接受输血的成人平民创伤患者中进行 WB 复苏,认识到某些人群的数据有限,包括育龄妇女,因此本指南可能不适用于这些人群。

证据水平

系统评价/荟萃分析;三级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验