Chuvileva Yulia E, Manangan Arie, Chew Aiken, Rutherford George, Barillas-Basterrechea Marcela, Barnoya Joaquín, Breysse Patrick N, Blanck Heidi, Liburd Leandris
Division of Adolescent and School Health (DASH), National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (NCCDPHP), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), USA.
Division of Environmental Health Science and Practice (DEHSP), National Center for Environmental Health (NCEH), CDC, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Appl Geogr. 2024;164. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2024.103204.
We evaluated the cross-context validity and equivalence of the US- and Canada-originated Retail Food Environment Index (RFEI) and modified RFEI (mRFEI) against a retail food environment dataset from the indigenous-majority city of Quetzaltenango (Xela), Guatemala. The RFEI/mRFEI failed to identify 77% of retailers and misclassified the healthiness of 42% of the remaining retailers in Xela, inaccurately labeling the city a food swamp. The RFEI/mRFEI are not currently suitable for mapping retail food environments in places like Quetzaltenango. Alternative functional and temporal classifications of retail food environments may provide measures with greater contextual fit, highlighting important cultural considerations for the study of place and dietary health.
我们对照危地马拉基切省首府(希纳)以原住民为主的城市的零售食品环境数据集,评估了源自美国和加拿大的零售食品环境指数(RFEI)和改良零售食品环境指数(mRFEI)的跨背景有效性和等效性。RFEI/mRFEI未能识别希纳77%的零售商,并且将其余42%零售商的健康程度错误分类,将该市错误地标记为食品荒漠。RFEI/mRFEI目前不适用于绘制像基切这样地方的零售食品环境。零售食品环境的替代功能和时间分类可能会提供更符合背景情况的衡量标准,突出研究地点和饮食健康时重要的文化考量因素。