Department of Restorative Dentistry, Division of Dental Material, Piracicaba Dental School, UNICAMP, SP, Brazil.
Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology, Division of Complete Denture, Piracicaba Dental School, UNICAMP, SP, Brazil.
Braz Dent J. 2024 Mar 22;35:e245674. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202405674. eCollection 2024.
This study verified the effect of surface treatments of the zirconia-reinforced lithium disilicate ceramic bonded to resin cement. Ceramic blocks were divided according to treatments (n=10): FA+SRX (Fluoric acid + silane RX), FA+MDP (Fluoric acid + MDP), FA+SCF+MDP (Fluoric acid + silane CF + MDP), FA+MEP (Fluoric acid + MEP), and MEP (Self-etch primer). Resin cement cylinders were made in the ceramic blocks, photoactivated with 1,200 mW/cm² for 40s, stored in water at 37°C for 24h, and evaluated by the microshear strength test, optical failure descriptive analysis (%), surface characterization (SEM) and contact angle (Goniometer). Other samples were submitted to 10,000 thermocycles between 5°C and 55°C. Bond strength data were submitted to two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test. Contact angle to one-way ANOVA and Games-Howell's test (5%). At 24h, MEP showed higher bond strength, and FA+SRX the lower. FA+MDP and FA+SCF+MDP showed similar values and FA+MEP was intermediate. After thermocycling, FA+SCF+MDP, FA+MEP, and MEP showed higher values, and FA+SRX the lower while FA+MDP was intermediate. When the periods were compared, FA+MDP, FA+SCF+MDP, FA+MEP, and MEP showed higher values for 24h while FA+SRX was similar. SEM showed retentive surface and crystal exposure when treated with FA+SCF+MDP. The less retentive surface was obtained with MEP, and the other treatments promoted intermediate irregularities. In conclusion, surface treatment and thermocycling promoted different values of adhesive strength and contact angle in a zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic. Failures were predominantly adhesive, and the ceramic surface was characterized by different levels of roughness and selective exposure of crystals.
本研究验证了氧化锆增强锂硅玻璃陶瓷与树脂水门汀结合的表面处理效果。将陶瓷块按处理方式(n=10)分组:FA+SRX(氢氟酸+硅烷 RX)、FA+MDP(氢氟酸+MDP)、FA+SCF+MDP(氢氟酸+硅烷 CF+MDP)、FA+MEP(氢氟酸+MEP)和 MEP(自酸蚀底漆)。在陶瓷块中制作树脂水泥圆柱体,用 1200mW/cm²光激活 40s,在 37°C水中储存 24h,然后通过微剪切强度测试、光失效描述性分析(%)、表面特性(SEM)和接触角(测角仪)进行评估。其他样本在 5°C 和 55°C 之间进行 10000 次热循环。将粘结强度数据进行双向方差分析和 Tukey 检验。接触角进行单向方差分析和 Games-Howell 检验(5%)。在 24h 时,MEP 显示出较高的粘结强度,FA+SRX 则较低。FA+MDP 和 FA+SCF+MDP 显示出相似的值,FA+MEP 则处于中间。热循环后,FA+SCF+MDP、FA+MEP 和 MEP 显示出较高的值,FA+SRX 则较低,而 FA+MDP 则处于中间。当比较周期时,FA+MDP、FA+SCF+MDP、FA+MEP 和 MEP 在 24h 时显示出较高的值,而 FA+SRX 则相似。SEM 显示,用 FA+SCF+MDP 处理后的表面具有保留性和晶体暴露。用 MEP 处理后表面保留性较低,而其他处理方式则导致表面出现中等不规则性。综上所述,表面处理和热循环在氧化锆增强锂硅玻璃陶瓷中产生了不同的粘结强度和接触角值。失效主要为粘结性失效,陶瓷表面具有不同程度的粗糙度和晶体选择性暴露特征。