Department of Otolaryngology, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Otolaryngology, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan; National Institute of Sensory Organs, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2024 Jun;51(3):537-541. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2024.01.001. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
To reveal differences in error pattern of phonemes and articulation between children using cochlear implants (CIs) and those using hearing aids (HAs) due to prelingual hearing disorder and help the education of children with prelingual hearing loss.
Children with prelingual hearing loss who were receiving auditory-verbal preschool education at an auditory center for hearing-impaired children (Fujimidai Auditory Center, Tokyo, Japan) from 2010 to 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. All participants underwent pure tone audiometry and monosyllabic intelligibility tests. The error answers were categorized into five patterns which was characterized by the substitution, addition, omission, failure, and no response according to consonant errors. In addition, the consonant errors classified into the manner of articulation and the differences of error patterns were analyzed between the HA and the CI group descriptively.
A total of 43 children with bilateral HAs and 46 children with bimodal CIs or bilateral CIs were enrolled. No significant between-group differences in median phoneme intelligibility were found. The most common error pattern was substitution in both HA and CI groups. The error number of addition pattern in the HA group was smaller than in the CI group. In both groups, the most common errors of articulation were flap errors, and the most common error patterns were flaps to nasals, nasals to nasals, plosives to plosives. In the HA group, plosives and nasals tended not to be recognized and in the CI group plosives were prone to be added to vowels.
There were some different error patterns of articulation and consonant substitution between groups. Clarifying differences of phoneme that are difficult to hear and tend to be misheard would help for creating an effective approach to auditory training for children with hearing loss.
揭示因言语前听力障碍而使用人工耳蜗(CI)和助听器(HA)的儿童在音位和发音错误模式上的差异,以帮助言语前听力损失儿童的教育。
回顾性分析 2010 年至 2020 年在日本东京富士见台听力障碍儿童听觉中心接受听觉言语学前教育的言语前听力损失儿童。所有参与者均接受纯音测听和单音节可懂度测试。根据辅音错误,错误答案分为替代、添加、遗漏、失败和无反应五类。此外,还根据发音方式和错误模式的差异对 HA 和 CI 组进行了描述性分析。
共纳入 43 例双侧 HA 和 46 例双侧 CI 或双侧 CI 的儿童。HA 和 CI 组的中位语音可懂度无显著组间差异。最常见的错误模式是替代,在 HA 和 CI 组均如此。HA 组添加模式的错误数小于 CI 组。在两组中,最常见的发音错误是边音错误,最常见的错误模式是边音变鼻音、鼻音变鼻音、塞音变塞音。在 HA 组,塞音和鼻音不易被识别,而在 CI 组,塞音易添加到元音中。
两组在发音和辅音替代的错误模式上存在一些差异。阐明难以听清和易听错的音位差异,将有助于为听力损失儿童创造有效的听觉训练方法。