Kowalczyk Damian, Turkowiak Miłosz, Piotrowski Wojciech Jerzy, Rosiak Oskar, Białas Adam Jerzy
Department of Pneumology, 2nd Chair of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, 90-153 Lodz, Poland.
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, National Institute of Medicine, Ministry of the Interior and Administration, 02-507 Warsaw, Poland.
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 9;13(6):1573. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061573.
: Dyspnea commonly stems from combined myocardial and pulmonary dysfunction, posing challenges for accurate pre-hospital diagnosis. Limited diagnostic capabilities hinder the differentiation of cardiac and pulmonary issues. This study assesses the efficacy of combined cardiac and pulmonary ultrasound using the BLUE, eFAST, and FATE protocols. : Participants were consecutively enrolled from dyspnea-related emergency calls in Warsaw, Poland, from 4 April 2022, to 15 June 2023. Patients with pleural effusion were identified through pre-hospital and in-hospital radiological assessments. Pre-hospital thoracic ultrasonography followed the BLUE, eFAST, and FATE protocols, alongside comprehensive clinical assessments. The pre-hospital diagnoses were juxtaposed with the with hospital discharge diagnoses. : Sixteen patients (8 men, 8 women; median age: 76 years) were enrolled. Inter-rater agreement for the BLUE protocol was substantial (κ = 0.78), as was agreement for eFAST (κ = 0.75), with almost perfect agreement for combined protocol assessment (κ = 0.83). Left ventricle hypokinesis, identified via the FATE protocol, significantly correlated with hospital-diagnosed decompensated heart failure as the primary cause of dyspnea. Sensitivity and specificity were 1.0 (95%CI: 0.62-1.0) and 0.6 (95%CI: 0.15-0.95), respectively. Positive predictive value was 0.85 (95%CI: 0.55-0.98), and diagnostic accuracy was 0.86 (95%CI: 0.62-0.98). : Integrating the FATE protocol into BLUE and eFAST enhances pre-hospital differential diagnosis accuracy of pleural effusion in adults. This synergistic approach streamlines diagnostic processes and facilitates informed clinical decision-making. Larger-scale validation studies are needed for broader applicability.
呼吸困难通常源于心肌和肺功能障碍的共同作用,这给准确的院前诊断带来了挑战。有限的诊断能力阻碍了对心脏和肺部问题的区分。本研究评估了使用BLUE、eFAST和FATE方案进行心脏和肺部联合超声检查的效果。
参与者连续纳入自2022年4月4日至2023年6月15日在波兰华沙与呼吸困难相关的紧急呼叫病例。通过院前和院内放射学评估确定胸腔积液患者。院前胸部超声检查遵循BLUE、eFAST和FATE方案,并进行全面的临床评估。将院前诊断与出院诊断进行对比。
共纳入16例患者(8例男性,8例女性;中位年龄:76岁)。BLUE方案的评分者间一致性较高(κ = 0.78),eFAST方案的一致性也较高(κ = 0.75),联合方案评估的一致性几乎达到完美(κ = 0.83)。通过FATE方案确定的左心室运动减弱与医院诊断的失代偿性心力衰竭作为呼吸困难的主要原因显著相关。敏感性和特异性分别为1.0(95%CI:0.62 - 1.0)和0.6(95%CI:0.15 - 0.95)。阳性预测值为0.85(95%CI:0.55 - 0.98),诊断准确性为0.86(95%CI:0.62 - 0.98)。
将FATE方案整合到BLUE和eFAST中可提高成人胸腔积液的院前鉴别诊断准确性。这种协同方法简化了诊断流程,有助于做出明智的临床决策。需要进行更大规模的验证研究以实现更广泛的应用。