Suppr超能文献

BYCROSS斑块旋切装置治疗股腘动脉阻塞的安全性和可行性:单中心短期结果

Safety and Feasibility of the BYCROSS Atherectomy Device for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Arterial Obstructions: Single-Center Short-Term Outcomes.

作者信息

van Leeuwen Goudje L, Bokkers Reinoud P H, Oldenziel Job, Schuurmann Richte C L, Vos Cornelis G, de Vries Jean-Paul P M

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.

Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 21;13(6):1809. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061809.

Abstract

Endovascular techniques have gained preference over peripheral arterial bypass surgery due to their minimally invasive nature; however, endovascular treatments often show limited efficacy in arterial segments with a high atherosclerotic load. The use of atherectomy devices enables the removal of calcified plaque material and may promote arterial wall remodeling. This study assessed the technical success, safety, and feasibility of the BYCROSS atherectomy device in femoropopliteal lesions. This single-center, retrospective cohort study analyzed elective patients undergoing BYCROSS atherectomy for chronic peripheral arterial disease from March 2022 to May 2023. Patient data, procedural details, and outcomes were retrospectively collected from electronic patient records. The primary performance endpoints of this study were technical success, complications, and patency rates. Primary safety endpoints included 30-day and short-term major adverse limb events (MALEs), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), and mortality rate. The study included 19 patients (median age, 71 years; 63% male) with Fontaine class IIb (26%), III (21%), or IV (53%). The BYCROSS atherectomy device was used to treat 22 limbs in the femoropopliteal tract, of which 11 lesions (50%) were occlusions and 11 were stenoses, with a median length of 24 cm (interquartile range: 17-38). Technical success was achieved in all cases: 4.5% required atherectomy only, 50% required additional balloon angioplasties, 41% required balloon angioplasties and stenting, and 4.5% required segments only stenting. Additional treatment of below-the-knee arteries was performed in 12 patients. Procedurally related complications (not limited to the use of the BYCROSS device) occurred in 23% of limbs, including distal embolization and laceration. At 30 days, mortality was 5%, the MACE rate was 11%, and the MALE rate was 0%. The observed mortality rate was not directly related to the procedure. Patency (<50% restenosis at duplex ultrasound) was 83% at 30 days. The use of the BYCROSS atherectomy device for the treatment of femoropopliteal lesions appears to be safe and feasible, with high technical success and low MALE and MACE rates in a challenging population with long-segment femoropopliteal lesions. Long-term follow-up in larger patient series is needed to confirm these findings and to determine the durability of this technique.

摘要

由于血管内技术具有微创性,其已比外周动脉搭桥手术更受青睐;然而,血管内治疗在动脉粥样硬化负荷较高的动脉节段往往疗效有限。使用斑块旋切装置能够去除钙化斑块物质,并可能促进动脉壁重塑。本研究评估了BYCROSS斑块旋切装置治疗股腘动脉病变的技术成功率、安全性和可行性。这项单中心回顾性队列研究分析了2022年3月至2023年5月期间因慢性外周动脉疾病接受BYCROSS斑块旋切术的择期患者。从电子病历中回顾性收集患者数据、手术细节和结果。本研究的主要性能终点为技术成功率、并发症和通畅率。主要安全终点包括30天和短期严重肢体不良事件(MALE)、严重心血管不良事件(MACE)和死亡率。该研究纳入了19例患者(中位年龄71岁;63%为男性),其Fontaine分级为IIb级(26%)、III级(21%)或IV级(53%)。BYCROSS斑块旋切装置用于治疗股腘动脉段的22条肢体,其中11处病变(50%)为闭塞性病变,11处为狭窄性病变,中位长度为24 cm(四分位间距:17 - 38)。所有病例均取得技术成功:4.5%仅需斑块旋切,50%需额外进行球囊血管成形术,41%需球囊血管成形术和支架置入,4.5%仅需节段性支架置入。12例患者对膝下动脉进行了额外治疗。23%的肢体发生了与手术相关的并发症(不限于BYCROSS装置的使用),包括远端栓塞和撕裂伤。30天时,死亡率为5%,MACE发生率为11%,MALE发生率为0%。观察到的死亡率与手术无直接关系。30天时的通畅率(双功超声显示再狭窄<50%)为83%。在具有长段股腘动脉病变的具有挑战性的人群中,使用BYCROSS斑块旋切装置治疗股腘动脉病变似乎是安全可行的,技术成功率高,MALE和MACE发生率低。需要在更大的患者系列中进行长期随访以证实这些发现,并确定该技术的耐久性。

相似文献

4
Technical aspects of the new BYCROSS atherectomy device - preliminary results after 28 patients.
Vasa. 2024 Nov;53(6):388-396. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a001151. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
7
Novel Therapeutic Concepts for Complex Femoropopliteal Lesions Using the Jetstream Atherectomy System.
J Endovasc Ther. 2024 Dec;31(6):1218-1226. doi: 10.1177/15266028231161246. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
10
Comparison of Atherectomy to Balloon Angioplasty and Stenting for Isolated Femoropopliteal Revascularization.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Nov;69:261-273. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.05.019. Epub 2020 Jun 6.

本文引用的文献

3
Lower limb arterial calcification and its clinical relevance with peripheral arterial disease.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Nov 24;10:1271100. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1271100. eCollection 2023.
5
Associations of Cardiac Biomarkers With Peripheral Artery Disease and Peripheral Neuropathy in US Adults Without Prevalent Cardiovascular Disease.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2023 Aug;43(8):1583-1591. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.122.318774. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
8
Atherectomy to treat femoropopliteal atherosclerotic disease.
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2023 Apr;64(2):184-198. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.23.12544-4. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
9
Surgery or Endovascular Therapy for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.
N Engl J Med. 2022 Dec 22;387(25):2305-2316. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2207899. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
10
Atherectomy vs Other Modalities for Treatment During Peripheral Vascular Intervention.
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022 Jul;24(7):869-877. doi: 10.1007/s11886-022-01709-1. Epub 2022 May 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验