Collen Jacob, Durning Steven, Berk Joshua, Mang Josef, Alcover Karl, Jung Eulho
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland.
J Clin Sleep Med. 2024 Aug 1;20(8):1279-1289. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.11134.
Connecting resident physician work hours and sleep deprivation to adverse outcomes has been difficult. Our study explores clinical reasoning rather than outcomes. Diagnostic errors are a leading cause of medical error and may result from deficits in clinical reasoning. We used simulated cases to explore relationships between sleep duration and diagnostic reasoning.
Residents were recruited for a 2-month study (inpatient/outpatient). Each participant's sleep was tracked (sleep diary/actigraphy). At the end of each month, residents watched 2 brief simulated clinical encounters and performed "think alouds" of their clinical reasoning. In each session, 1 video was straightforward and the other video contained distracting contextual factors. Sessions were recorded, transcribed, and interpreted. We conducted a thematic analysis using a constant comparative approach. Themes were compared based on sleep duration and contextual factors.
Residents (n = 17) slept more during outpatient compared with inpatient months (450.5 ± 7.13 vs 425.6 ± 10.78 hours, = .02). We found the following diagnostic reasoning themes: uncertainty, disorganized knowledge, error, semantic incompetence, emotional content, and organized knowledge. Themes reflecting suboptimal clinical reasoning (disorganized knowledge, error, semantic incompetence, uncertainty) were observed more in cases with contextual factors (distractors). "Think alouds" from cases with contextual factors following sleep restriction had a greater number of themes concerning for problematic diagnostic reasoning.
Residents obtained significantly more sleep during outpatient compared with inpatient months. Several negative clinical reasoning themes emerged with less sleep combined with cases containing contextual distractors. Our findings reinforce the importance of adequate sleep and supervision in house officers, particularly in cases with distracting elements.
Collen J, Durning S, Berk J, Mang J, Alcover K, Jung E. Exploring sleep duration and clinical reasoning process in resident physicians: a thematic analysis. . 2024;20(8):1279-1289.
将住院医师的工作时长和睡眠剥夺与不良后果联系起来一直很困难。我们的研究探索的是临床推理而非结果。诊断错误是医疗差错的主要原因,可能源于临床推理缺陷。我们使用模拟病例来探索睡眠时间与诊断推理之间的关系。
招募住院医师参与一项为期2个月的研究(包括住院和门诊)。记录每位参与者的睡眠情况(睡眠日记/活动记录仪)。在每个月结束时,住院医师观看2段简短的模拟临床诊疗视频,并对他们的临床推理进行“大声思考”。在每次诊疗中,1段视频情况简单明了,另一段视频包含干扰性背景因素。诊疗过程进行记录、转录和解读。我们采用持续比较法进行主题分析。根据睡眠时间和背景因素对主题进行比较。
与住院月相比,住院医师在门诊月的睡眠时间更多(450.5±7.13小时对425.6±10.78小时,P = 0.02)。我们发现了以下诊断推理主题:不确定性、知识混乱、错误、语义理解不足、情感内容和知识条理。反映临床推理欠佳(知识混乱、错误、语义理解不足、不确定性)的主题在存在背景因素(干扰因素)的病例中更为常见。睡眠受限后,存在背景因素的病例的“大声思考”中,涉及有问题的诊断推理的主题更多。
与住院月相比,住院医师在门诊月的睡眠时间明显更多。睡眠不足加上包含背景干扰因素的病例会出现几个负面的临床推理主题。我们的研究结果强化了住院医师充足睡眠和监督的重要性,尤其是在存在干扰因素的病例中。
科伦J、德宁S、伯克J、芒J、阿尔科弗K、荣格E。探索住院医师的睡眠时间和临床推理过程:一项主题分析。……2024;20(8):1279 - 1289。