Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 May;144(5):2443-2447. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05277-7. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
Patients and physicians often underestimate cat bite injuries. The deep and narrow wound seals quickly and provides an environment for the inoculated saliva and bacteria. Interestingly, the literature reports no bacterial growth in the microbiological workup of wound swaps in up to 43%. The time between bite injury and the first clinical presentation, the start of antibiotic treatment and surgical debridement might affect these findings. Therefore, the current project examines if (1) these factors impact the outcome of microbiological results following cat bite injuries and (2) the detection of bacterial growth leads to higher complication rates, longer hospital stays, longer total treatment time, or higher total treatment costs.
This single-center retrospective study analyzed data from 102 adult patients. All patients received antibiotic and surgical treatment following a cat bite injury. Microbiological samples were collected during surgery in all cases. The time from the bite incident to the first presentation, beginning of antibiotic administration, and surgical debridement was calculated. Demographic data, complication rate, length of hospital stay, total treatment time, and total treatment costs were recorded. (1) A generalized linear model was fitted using the microbiological outcome as the dependent variable. (2) Two groups (negative or positive microbiological results) were formed and statistically compared.
The median age was 50 (SD 16), and 72% were female. (1) The time from the bite incident to the first clinical presentation, antibiotic administration, or surgical treatment was not associated with the outcome of the microbiological result. (2) No significant differences were observed between the two groups.
Our data do not suggest that early antibiotic administration or delayed surgical treatment affects the outcome of the microbiological workup following cat bite injuries to the hand and forearm. The microbiological outcome did not affect the complication rate, treatment time, and total treatment costs.
患者和医生经常低估猫咬伤的危害。伤口深而狭窄,迅速愈合,为接种的唾液和细菌提供了一个环境。有趣的是,文献报道在多达 43%的情况下,伤口拭子的微生物学检查中没有细菌生长。从咬伤到首次出现临床症状、开始使用抗生素治疗和进行清创术之间的时间可能会影响这些发现。因此,本项目研究了以下两个问题:(1)这些因素是否会影响猫咬伤后微生物学结果的结果;(2)细菌生长的检测是否会导致更高的并发症发生率、更长的住院时间、更长的总治疗时间或更高的总治疗费用。
这是一项单中心回顾性研究,分析了 102 名成年患者的数据。所有患者在猫咬伤后均接受抗生素和手术治疗。所有病例均在手术过程中采集微生物样本。从咬伤事件到首次就诊、开始使用抗生素和清创术的时间均进行了计算。记录了人口统计学数据、并发症发生率、住院时间、总治疗时间和总治疗费用。(1)使用微生物学结果作为因变量拟合广义线性模型。(2)形成阴性和阳性微生物学结果两组,并进行统计学比较。
患者的中位年龄为 50 岁(标准差 16 岁),72%为女性。(1)从咬伤事件到首次出现临床症状、使用抗生素或进行手术治疗的时间与微生物学结果的结果无关。(2)两组之间没有观察到显著差异。
我们的数据表明,猫咬伤手部和前臂后,早期使用抗生素或延迟手术治疗不会影响微生物学检查的结果。微生物学结果不会影响并发症发生率、治疗时间和总治疗费用。