School of Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, NO. 2318, Yuhangtang Rd, Yuhang District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 311121, China.
Psychiatry Department, Desheng Community Healthcare Centers, Xicheng District, Beijing 100035, China.
Compr Psychiatry. 2024 Jul;132:152474. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2024.152474. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
The reason why some people with severe mental illness (SMI) maintain positive self-identity, while some are affected by the stigmatized environment is unclear.
To describe the status of individual stigma and explore the relationship between self-stigma, stigma resistance and related variables in people with SMI.
A cross-sectional study was conducted from April 2021 to March 2022. The Chinese version of Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness Scale and Stigma Resistance Scale were used to assess individual stigma. Perceived public stigma, psychological capital, stigma stress appraisal and coping orientations were also measured by scales. Data was provided by 422 patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, from one psychiatric hospital and four community healthcare centers in China. A structural equation model was applied for analysis.
The total mean scores of self-stigma and stigma resistance were (2.06 ± 0.65), and (3.95 ± 0.84). Perceived public stigma was the primary condition for constructing individual stigma, which indirectly affected self-stigma (β = 0.268) and stigma resistance (β = -0.145). Stigma stress appraisal mediated the transformation of public stigma into individual, which had direct and indirect effects on self-stigma (β = 0.417, 0.166), and an indirect effect on stigma resistance (β = -0.374). Secrecy positively affected self-stigma (β = 0.117), while positive coping positively affected stigma resistance (β = 0.380). Psychological capital significantly directly impacted individual stigma.
Findings highlighted how public stigma determines the degree to which patients with SMI deal with stigma stress appraisal, and how this influences individuals. Anti-stigma programs and interventions to improve individuals' psychological capital and coping capabilities should be emphasized.
一些患有严重精神疾病(SMI)的人保持积极的自我认同,而另一些人则受到污名化环境的影响,其原因尚不清楚。
描述个体污名的现状,并探讨 SMI 患者的自我污名、抗污名与相关变量之间的关系。
采用横断面研究方法,于 2021 年 4 月至 2022 年 3 月,选取中国一家精神病院和四家社区卫生服务中心的 422 例精神分裂症或双相障碍患者,使用中文版精神疾病内化污名量表和抗污名量表评估个体污名,同时采用感知公众污名量表、心理资本量表、污名压力评估量表和应对取向量表评估相关变量。采用结构方程模型进行分析。
自我污名和抗污名的总均数分别为(2.06±0.65)分和(3.95±0.84)分。感知公众污名是构建个体污名的主要条件,间接影响自我污名(β=0.268)和抗污名(β=-0.145)。污名压力评估中介了公众污名向个体污名的转化,对自我污名(β=0.417,0.166)和抗污名(β=-0.374)均有直接和间接影响。保密对自我污名有正向影响(β=0.117),而积极应对则对抗污名有正向影响(β=0.380)。心理资本显著直接影响个体污名。
研究结果强调了公众污名如何决定 SMI 患者应对污名压力评估的程度,以及这如何影响个体。应强调开展反污名项目和干预措施,以提高个体的心理资本和应对能力。