Suppr超能文献

内镜下黏膜剥离术治疗内镜切除术后食管浅表鳞状细胞癌瘢痕的疗效。

Outcomes of repeated endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma on endoscopic resection scar.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.

Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan.

出版信息

Dis Esophagus. 2024 Jul 3;37(7). doi: 10.1093/dote/doae018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) can be performed for superficial esophageal cancer. However, performing ESD for superficial esophageal cancer on a previous endoscopic resection scar may be difficult.

METHODS

We compared the outcomes between ESD for superficial esophageal cancers on previous endoscopic resection scar (group A) and that for naïve lesions (group B). The study included outcomes of ESD, cumulative incidence of local failure, and predictors of the occurrence of local failure in ESD patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The outcome variables evaluated were en bloc resection rates, procedure times, adverse events, and overall survival rates.

RESULTS

Overall, 220 lesions were extracted (groups A and B: 23 and 197 lesions, respectively). In groups A and B, the complete resection rates were 60.9 and 92.9% (P < 0.001), and the mean procedure times were 79 and 68 min (P = 0.15), respectively. The perforation rates in groups A and B were 4.3 and 1% (P = 0.28). The 1-year cumulative local failure rates were 22 and 1% (P < 0.001), respectively. In the multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, superficial esophageal SCC on a previous endoscopic resection scar was a strong predictor of local failure (hazard ratio = 21.95 [3.99-120.80], P < 0.001). The 3-year overall survival rates in groups A and B were 95 and 93% (P = 0.99), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeated ESD on scar is an option for treating superficial esophageal SCC with an acceptable rate of adverse events. Because of the low complete resection rate and high local failure compared with conventional ESD, strict endoscopic follow-up is required after repeated esophageal ESD.

摘要

背景

内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)可用于治疗早期食管癌。然而,在先前内镜切除的瘢痕上进行 ESD 可能较为困难。

方法

我们比较了在先前内镜切除瘢痕上(A 组)和初发病变上(B 组)行 ESD 治疗早期食管癌的结果。该研究包括 ESD 结果、局部失败的累积发生率以及预测 ESD 治疗食管鳞癌(SCC)患者局部失败的因素。评估的结局变量包括整块切除率、手术时间、不良事件和总生存率。

结果

共纳入 220 处病灶(A 组和 B 组分别为 23 处和 197 处)。A 组和 B 组的完全切除率分别为 60.9%和 92.9%(P<0.001),手术时间分别为 79 分钟和 68 分钟(P=0.15)。A 组和 B 组的穿孔率分别为 4.3%和 1%(P=0.28)。A 组和 B 组的 1 年累积局部失败率分别为 22%和 1%(P<0.001)。多因素 Cox 比例风险分析显示,先前内镜切除瘢痕上的早期食管 SCC 是局部失败的强烈预测因素(风险比=21.95[3.99-120.80],P<0.001)。A 组和 B 组的 3 年总生存率分别为 95%和 93%(P=0.99)。

结论

在可接受的不良事件发生率的前提下,对瘢痕进行重复 ESD 是治疗早期食管 SCC 的一种选择。由于与常规 ESD 相比,完全切除率较低,局部失败率较高,因此需要对重复食管 ESD 后进行严格的内镜随访。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验