Department of Radiology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215028, China.
Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, China.
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024 Aug;49(8):2606-2621. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04263-2. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
To investigate imaging findings on gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI) and prognosis of clear cell hepatocellular carcinoma (CCHCC) comparing with non-otherwise specified hepatocellular carcinoma (NOS-HCC).
The clinical, pathological and MR imaging features of 42 patients with CCHCC and 84 age-matched patients with NOS-HCC were retrospectively analyzed from January 2015 to October 2021. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression and Cox regression analyses were performed to identify independent diagnostic and prognostic factors for CCHCC. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis.
CCHCC showed fat content more frequently (P < 0.001) and relatively higher Edmondson tumor grade (P = 0.001) compared with NOS-HCC. The lesion-to-muscle ratio (LMR) and lesion-to-liver ratio (LLR) of CCHCC on pre-enhancement T1-weighted imaging (pre-T1WI) (P = 0.001, P = 0.003) and hepatobiliary phase (HBP) (P = 0.007, P = 0.048) were significantly higher than those of NOS-HCC. The area under the curve (AUC) for fat content, LLR on pre-T1WI and their combination with better diagnostic performance in predicting CCHCC were 0.678, 0.666, and 0.750, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in clinical outcomes between CCHCC and NOS-HCC. Multivariate Cox analysis confirmed that tumor size > 2 cm and enhancing capsule were independent prognostic factors for DFS and OS among CCHCC patients.
Fat content and adjusted lesion signal intensity on pre-T1WI and HBP could be used to differentiate CCHCC from NOS-HCC. CCHCC had similar prognosis with NOS-HCC.
通过钆塞酸二钠增强磁共振成像(Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI)研究与非特指型肝细胞肝癌(NOS-HCC)相比,透明细胞型肝细胞肝癌(CCHCC)的影像学表现与预后。
回顾性分析 2015 年 1 月至 2021 年 10 月间 42 例 CCHCC 患者和 84 例年龄匹配的 NOS-HCC 患者的临床、病理和磁共振成像特征。采用单因素和多因素逻辑回归及 Cox 回归分析,确定 CCHCC 的独立诊断和预后因素。通过 Kaplan-Meier 分析确定无病生存(DFS)和总生存(OS)。
与 NOS-HCC 相比,CCHCC 显示出更频繁的脂肪含量(P<0.001)和相对较高的 Edmondson 肿瘤分级(P=0.001)。CCHCC 的病变与肌肉比(LMR)和病变与肝脏比(LLR)在增强前 T1 加权成像(pre-T1WI)(P=0.001,P=0.003)和肝胆期(HBP)(P=0.007,P=0.048)上显著高于 NOS-HCC。脂肪含量、pre-T1WI 上的 LLR 及其组合预测 CCHCC 的诊断性能的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为 0.678、0.666 和 0.750。CCHCC 和 NOS-HCC 之间的临床结果无统计学差异。多因素 Cox 分析证实肿瘤大小>2cm 和增强包膜是 CCHCC 患者 DFS 和 OS 的独立预后因素。
增强前 T1WI 和 HBP 上的脂肪含量和调整后的病变信号强度可用于区分 CCHCC 与 NOS-HCC。CCHCC 的预后与 NOS-HCC 相似。