Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials Sciences, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Dent Educ. 2024 Aug;88(8):1048-1054. doi: 10.1002/jdd.13536. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: A career in healthcare is built on the foundations of continuous self-reflection and self-assessment. Previous studies have solely compared student self-assessment to faculty grades in a single discipline. The objective of this study was to investigate whether associations of a student's self-assessment skills exist across multiple disciplines in the predoctoral setting.
Sixty-five students from two class years at the Harvard School of Dental Medicine completed preclinical competency exams in dental anatomy waxing and operative dentistry. The difference between the student's self-assessment score and average faculty grade for each exercise was calculated as the student‒faculty (S-F) gap, which served as a proxy to determine how students evaluate their work. Regression analysis was performed to assess associations between wax-up and preclinical operative S-F gaps.
Mean S-F gaps for waxing and preclinical operative procedures were positive (5.7 ± 6.1 and 7.6 ± 6.7, respectively). Additionally, students in the lower quartile tended to overestimate performance to a greater degree than their peers in the upper quartile. Furthermore, the waxing S-F gaps were positively associated with S-F gaps of each operative procedure, particularly with the combined operative exercise S-F gaps, where a statistically significant association was seen (coefficient = 0.28; p = 0.04).
CONCLUSION(S): Previously, we identified a negative correlation between students' self-assessment skills (S-F gaps) and their preclinical performance. In this study, we further demonstrated an association of S-F gaps in two fundamental exercises: wax-up and operative dentistry. This underscores the roles of S-F gaps as possible indicators of students' preclinical and clinical performance, and it holds potential to become a widely standardized and applicable calculation that may help evaluate the effectiveness of the dental curricula and optimize student learning.
目的/目标:医疗保健职业建立在持续自我反思和自我评估的基础上。以前的研究仅将学生的自我评估与单一学科的教师评分进行了比较。本研究的目的是调查在牙科学院的预科环境中,学生的自我评估技能是否与多个学科相关联。
哈佛牙医学院两个年级的 65 名学生完成了牙体解剖蜡型和口腔修复学的临床前能力考试。学生自我评估分数与每个练习的平均教师分数之间的差异被计算为学生与教师(S-F)差距,该差距可作为确定学生如何评估自己工作的指标。回归分析用于评估蜡型和临床前操作 S-F 差距之间的关联。
蜡型和临床前操作 S-F 差距的平均值为正值(分别为 5.7±6.1 和 7.6±6.7)。此外,处于较低四分位数的学生比处于较高四分位数的学生更倾向于过度高估自己的表现。此外,蜡型 S-F 差距与每个操作程序的 S-F 差距呈正相关,特别是与综合操作练习的 S-F 差距呈正相关,存在统计学显著关联(系数为 0.28;p=0.04)。
以前,我们发现学生自我评估技能(S-F 差距)与他们的临床前表现呈负相关。在这项研究中,我们进一步证明了两个基本练习(蜡型和口腔修复学)的 S-F 差距之间存在关联。这强调了 S-F 差距作为学生临床前和临床表现的可能指标的作用,并有可能成为一种广泛标准化和适用的计算方法,可用于评估牙科课程的有效性并优化学生学习。