Suppr超能文献

社会药学和实践研究论文被引因素分析。

Drivers of citations in social pharmacy and practice research articles.

机构信息

Western New England University College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Springfield, MA, USA.

Touro University California, Vallejo, CA, USA.

出版信息

Res Social Adm Pharm. 2024 Jul;20(7):590-596. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.03.004. Epub 2024 Mar 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy has been expanding in the last decade. The recently published Granada Statements offer key recommendations to improve the quality of research in this field.

OBJECTIVES

To identify the factors associated with the citations of articles in the field of social, administrative, clinical pharmacy and practice research.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective, observational analysis of articles published in three leading journals. Per article Google Scholar citations was the dependent variable. Predictor variables were extracted from all articles published from 2013 to 2015. The dependent variable was dichotomized using sample's median Google Scholar citations. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of citations ≥ median.

RESULTS

The median number of citations per article was 17 (range 0-341), with a mean of 24.2 (SD 27.6). The number of references included in the articles (OR 1.03, CI 1.02-1.04), the year of publication (OR 0.31 CI 0.21-0.46 for articles published 2015), article social media mentions (OR = 1.01, CI 1.01-1.03 and OR 1.10 CI 1.04-1.18 for Facebook and X, respectively), the topic area of research namely pharmacy services (OR 1.65, CI 1.06-2.57) and medication adherence (OR 2.22 CI 1.13-4.33) were independently associated with article having citations ≥ median.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of references, the year of publication, social media mentions and the topic area of research, namely pharmacy services and medication adherence, were associated with citations above median in the leading journals of social and administrative pharmacy research. Authors may consider providing a thorough literature review in their articles, while researchers, editors, and publishers are advised to use social media to promote newly published work. This article complements the Granada Statements and may contribute to fostering wider dissemination of the discipline's outputs.

摘要

背景

社会与管理药学领域的研究在过去十年中不断发展。最近发布的《格拉纳达声明》为提高该领域研究质量提供了关键建议。

目的

确定与社会、行政、临床药学和实践研究领域文章引用相关的因素。

方法

本研究是对三篇领先期刊发表的文章进行的回顾性、观察性分析。每篇文章的 Google Scholar 引用次数为因变量。从 2013 年至 2015 年发表的所有文章中提取预测变量。使用样本的中位数 Google Scholar 引用次数对因变量进行二分。采用逻辑回归分析识别引用量≥中位数的独立预测因子。

结果

每篇文章的平均引用次数中位数为 17(范围 0-341),平均值为 24.2(标准差 27.6)。文章中引用的参考文献数量(OR 1.03,CI 1.02-1.04)、出版年份(OR 0.31,CI 0.21-0.46,用于 2015 年发表的文章)、文章社交媒体提及(OR=1.01,CI 1.01-1.03 和 OR 1.10,CI 1.04-1.18,分别用于 Facebook 和 X)、研究主题领域即药学服务(OR 1.65,CI 1.06-2.57)和药物依从性(OR 2.22,CI 1.13-4.33)与文章引用量≥中位数独立相关。

结论

参考文献数量、出版年份、社交媒体提及以及研究主题领域,即药学服务和药物依从性,与社会与管理药学研究的主要期刊中的引用量高于中位数相关。作者在文章中可以考虑提供全面的文献综述,而研究人员、编辑和出版商则应利用社交媒体来推广新发表的作品。本文补充了《格拉纳达声明》,并可能有助于促进该学科成果的更广泛传播。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验