Yeganeh Ladan, Willey Suzanne, Wan Ching Shan, Bahri Khomami Mahnaz, Chehrazi Mohammad, Cook Olivia, Webber Kate
Monash Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia; Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, VIC, Australia.
Monash Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Peninsula Campus, VIC, Australia.
Maturitas. 2024 Jul;185:107977. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2024.107977. Epub 2024 Mar 29.
Lifestyle/behavioural interventions may improve breast cancer outcomes and quality of life (QoL); however, uncertainty remains about the most effective interventions due to limited evidence. This study aimed to assess and compare the effects of lifestyle/behavioural interventions on cancer recurrence, survival and QoL in breast cancer survivors. Electronic databases including Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and EBM Reviews were searched for relevant literature. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing a lifestyle/behavioural intervention with a control condition in breast cancer survivors were included. Outcomes included cancer recurrence, overall survival and QoL. A network meta-analysis synthesized intervention effect. Studies not included in the analysis were reported narratively. Of 6251 identified articles, 38 studies met the selection criteria. Limited evidence exists on the impacts of lifestyle/behavioural interventions on breast cancer recurrence/survival. Exercise was identified as the most effective intervention in improving overall survival (HR 0.50, 95 % CI 0.36, 0.68). Lifestyle/behavioural interventions may improve QoL; psychosocial interventions (SMD 1.28, 95 % CI 0.80, 1.77) and aerobic-resistance exercise (SMD 0.33, 95 % CI -0.03, 0.69) were the most effective interventions to enhance QoL. This review highlights potential post-breast cancer benefits from lifestyle/behavioural interventions, notably exercise and psychosocial support for QoL and exercise for overall survival. Thus, encouraging active lifestyle, stress management and coping skills programs during and after cancer treatment may enhance physical wellbeing and QoL. However, the findings should be interpreted with caution due to the small number and sample sizes of studies. Future longer-term RCTs are required for conclusive recommendations.
生活方式/行为干预可能会改善乳腺癌的治疗效果和生活质量(QoL);然而,由于证据有限,关于最有效的干预措施仍存在不确定性。本研究旨在评估和比较生活方式/行为干预对乳腺癌幸存者癌症复发、生存率和生活质量的影响。检索了包括Medline、EMBASE、PsycINFO、CINAHL和循证医学评论在内的电子数据库以查找相关文献。纳入了比较乳腺癌幸存者生活方式/行为干预与对照条件的随机对照试验(RCT)和半随机对照试验。结局包括癌症复发、总生存率和生活质量。采用网状Meta分析综合干预效果。对未纳入分析的研究进行了描述性报告。在6251篇已识别的文章中,38项研究符合入选标准。关于生活方式/行为干预对乳腺癌复发/生存影响的证据有限。运动被确定为改善总生存率最有效的干预措施(风险比0.50,95%置信区间0.36,0.68)。生活方式/行为干预可能会改善生活质量;心理社会干预(标准化均数差1.28,95%置信区间0.80,1.77)和有氧抗阻运动(标准化均数差0.33,95%置信区间-0.03,0.69)是改善生活质量最有效的干预措施。本综述强调了生活方式/行为干预对乳腺癌潜在的益处,特别是运动和心理社会支持对生活质量的改善以及运动对总生存率的提高。因此,在癌症治疗期间和之后鼓励积极的生活方式、压力管理和应对技能计划可能会提高身体健康和生活质量。然而,由于研究数量少和样本量小,这些发现应谨慎解读。需要未来进行更长期的随机对照试验以得出确定性的建议。