Suppr超能文献

结肠癌体内吻合术的细菌污染及中期肿瘤学结局评估:一项倾向评分匹配分析

Evaluation of bacterial contamination and medium-term oncological outcomes of intracorporeal anastomosis for colon cancer: A propensity score matching analysis.

作者信息

Kayano Hajime, Mamuro Nana, Kamei Yutaro, Ogimi Takashi, Miyakita Hiroshi, Nakagohri Toshio, Koyanagi Kazuo, Mori Masaki, Yamamoto Seiichiro

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara 259-1193, Kanagawa, Japan.

出版信息

World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Mar 27;16(3):670-680. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i3.670.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although intracorporeal anastomosis (IA) for colon cancer requires longer operative time than extracorporeal anastomosis (EA), its short-term postoperative results, such as early recovery of bowel movement, have been reported to be equal or better. As IA requires opening the intestinal tract in the abdominal cavity under pneumoperitoneum, there are concerns about intraperitoneal bacterial infection and recurrence of peritoneal dissemination due to the spread of bacteria and tumor cells. However, intraperitoneal bacterial contamination and medium-term oncological outcomes have not been clarified.

AIM

To clarify the effects of bacterial and tumor cell contamination of the intra-abdominal cavity in IA.

METHODS

Of 127 patients who underwent laparoscopic colon resection for colon cancer from April 2015 to December 2020, 75 underwent EA (EA group), and 52 underwent IA (IA group). After propensity score matching, the primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival rates, and secondary endpoints were 3-year overall survival rates, type of recurrence, surgical site infection (SSI) incidence, number of days on antibiotics, and postoperative biological responses.

RESULTS

Three-year disease-free survival rates did not significantly differ between the IA and EA groups (87.2% and 82.7%, respectively, = 0.4473). The 3-year overall survival rates also did not significantly differ between the IA and EA groups (94.7% and 94.7%, respectively; = 0.9891). There was no difference in the type of recurrence between the two groups. In addition, there were no significant differences in SSI incidence or the number of days on antibiotics; however, postoperative biological responses, such as the white blood cell count (10200 8650/mm, = 0.0068), C-reactive protein (6.8 4.5 mg/dL, = 0.0011), and body temperature (37.7 37.5 °C, = 0.0079), were significantly higher in the IA group.

CONCLUSION

IA is an anastomotic technique that should be widely performed because its risk of intraperitoneal bacterial contamination and medium-term oncological outcomes are comparable to those of EA.

摘要

背景

尽管结肠癌的体内吻合术(IA)比体外吻合术(EA)需要更长的手术时间,但其术后短期结果,如肠道运动的早期恢复,据报道是相同或更好的。由于IA需要在气腹下打开腹腔内的肠道,因此存在因细菌和肿瘤细胞扩散导致腹腔内细菌感染和腹膜播散复发的担忧。然而,腹腔内细菌污染和中期肿瘤学结果尚未明确。

目的

阐明IA术中腹腔内细菌和肿瘤细胞污染的影响。

方法

在2015年4月至2020年12月期间接受腹腔镜结肠癌切除术的127例患者中,75例行EA(EA组),52例行IA(IA组)。经过倾向评分匹配后,主要终点是3年无病生存率,次要终点是3年总生存率、复发类型、手术部位感染(SSI)发生率、抗生素使用天数和术后生物学反应。

结果

IA组和EA组的3年无病生存率无显著差异(分别为87.2%和82.7%,P = 0.4473)。IA组和EA组的3年总生存率也无显著差异(分别为94.7%和94.7%;P = 0.9891)。两组的复发类型无差异。此外,SSI发生率或抗生素使用天数也无显著差异;然而,IA组术后的生物学反应,如白细胞计数(10200±8650/mm³,P = 0.0068)、C反应蛋白(6.8±4.5mg/dL,P = 0.0011)和体温(37.7±37.5℃,P = 0.0079)明显更高。

结论

IA是一种应广泛开展的吻合技术,因为其腹腔内细菌污染风险和中期肿瘤学结果与EA相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8399/10989348/e4f5aef048a3/WJGS-16-670-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验