Tang Chenrui, Hou Junwen, Liu Dongping, Xi Beidou, Li Jie, Yu Huibin
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China; School of Environmental and Municipal Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China.
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China; College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Jun 1;927:172193. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172193. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
Humus, an important fraction of soil organic matter, play an environmental role on nutrients, organic and inorganic pollutants in riparian zones of urbanized rivers. In this study, dynamic variation process of humus fractions from riparian soils was revealed along Puhe River. Composite soil samples of four depths were collected from four land-uses, i.e., eco-conservation area (ECA), industrial area (INA), urban/town area (UTA), rural/agricultural area (RAA). Based on synchronous fluorescence spectra coupled with Gaussian band fitting, fulvic/humic acid predominantly contained tyrosine-like (TYLF), tryptophan-like (TRLF), microbial-like (MLF), fulvic-like (FLF) and humic-like (HLF) substances within each soil profile. TRLF, MLF and FLF (89.43-90.30 %) are the representative components in fulvic-acid, while MLF and HLF (52.81-59.97 %) in humic-acid. Phenolic, carboxylic and humified materials were present in both humus. According to 2-dimensitonal correlation spectroscopy and canonical correlation analysis, fulvic/humic acid within the ECA soil profile could be mainly derived from the degradations of terrestrial plant metabolites and residuals. Within the INA, fulvic-acid could be associated with treated/untreated wastewater, which entered the river and flew into the riparian during high flow period; whereas humic-acid could be relative to the terrestrials. Fulvic-acid had the same source as humic-acid in the UTA, which might be concerned with scattered domestic sewage and livestock wastewater, rather than the fluvial water. Furthermore, the source of fulvic/humic acid in the RAA was the crop metabolites and residuals, apart from the livestock wastewater. Noticeably, the variations of humus fractions in the ECA and RAA roughly occurred in 0-60 cm, while approximately in 20-80 cm in the INA and UTA. This proved that humus fractions in the former were referred to the plant/crop residuals, whereas humus fractions in the latter were those the terrestrials and fluvial water. This study could provide a key support for the construction and restoration of the urbanized riparian zone.
腐殖质作为土壤有机质的重要组成部分,对城市化河流河岸带的养分、有机和无机污染物具有环境作用。本研究揭示了蒲河沿岸土壤腐殖质组分的动态变化过程。从生态保护区(ECA)、工业区(INA)、城镇区(UTA)、农村/农业区(RAA)四种土地利用类型中采集了四个深度的复合土壤样本。基于同步荧光光谱结合高斯峰拟合,各土壤剖面中的富里酸/腐殖酸主要包含类酪氨酸(TYLF)、类色氨酸(TRLF)、类微生物(MLF)、类富里酸(FLF)和类腐殖酸(HLF)物质。TRLF、MLF和FLF(89.43 - 90.30%)是富里酸中的代表性成分,而MLF和HLF(52.81 - 59.97%)是腐殖酸中的代表性成分。两种腐殖质中均存在酚类、羧酸类和腐殖化物质。根据二维相关光谱和典型相关分析,ECA土壤剖面中的富里酸/腐殖酸主要来源于陆地植物代谢产物和残体的降解。在INA中,富里酸可能与经处理/未经处理的废水有关,这些废水在高流量时期进入河流并流入河岸带;而腐殖酸可能与陆地来源有关。UTA中富里酸的来源与腐殖酸相同,这可能与分散的生活污水和牲畜废水有关,而非河水。此外,RAA中富里酸/腐殖酸的来源除了牲畜废水外,还有作物代谢产物和残体。值得注意的是,ECA和RAA中腐殖质组分的变化大致发生在0 - 60厘米,而INA和UTA中大约在20 - 80厘米。这证明前者的腐殖质组分与植物/作物残体有关,而后者的腐殖质组分与陆地和河水有关。本研究可为城市化河岸带的建设和修复提供关键支持。