Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tauranga Hospital, Bay of Plenty, Private Bag 12024, Tauranga, 3143, New Zealand.
Department of Medicine, The University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 May;144(5):2019-2026. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05235-3. Epub 2024 Apr 6.
Routine total hip arthroplasty (THA) using a short cemented stem as compared with a standard length cemented stem may have benefits in terms of stress distribution, bone preservation, stem subsidence and ease of revision surgery. Two senior arthroplasty surgeons transitioned their routine femoral implant from a standard 150 mm Exeter V40 cemented stem to a short 125 mm Exeter V40 cemented stem for all patients over the course of several years. We analysed revision rates, adjusted survival, and PROMS scores for patients who received a standard stem and a short stem in routine THA.
All THAs performed by the two surgeons between January 2011 and December 2021 were included. All procedures were performed using either a 150 mm or 125 mm Exeter V40 stem. Demographic data, acetabular implant type, and outcome data including implant survival, reason for revision, and post-operative Oxford Hip Scores were obtained from the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR), and detailed survival analyses were performed. Primary outcome was revision for any reason. Reason for revision, including femoral or acetabular failure, and time to revision were also recorded.
1335 THAs were included. 516 using the 150 mm stem and 819 using the 125 mm stem. There were 4055.5 and 3227.8 component years analysed in the standard stem and short stem groups respectively due to a longer mean follow up in the 150 mm group. Patient reported outcomes were comparable across all groups. Revision rates were comparable between the standard 150 mm stem (0.44 revisions/100 component years) and the short 125 mm stem (0.56 revisions/100 component years) with no statistically significant difference found (p = 0.240).
Routine use of a short 125 mm stem had no statistically significant impact on revision rate or PROMS scores when compared to a standard 150 mm stem. There may be benefits to routine use of a short cemented femoral implant.
与标准长度的水泥股骨柄相比,常规全髋关节置换术(THA)使用短水泥股骨柄在应力分布、骨保存、柄下沉和翻修手术难度方面可能具有优势。两位资深关节置换外科医生在数年的时间里,将他们常规使用的股骨植入物从标准的 150 毫米 Exeter V40 水泥股骨柄转换为短的 125 毫米 Exeter V40 水泥股骨柄。我们分析了在常规 THA 中接受标准柄和短柄的患者的翻修率、调整后的生存率和 PROMS 评分。
纳入了两位外科医生在 2011 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间进行的所有 THA。所有手术均使用 150 毫米或 125 毫米 Exeter V40 股骨柄。从新西兰关节登记处(NZJR)获得了人口统计学数据、髋臼植入物类型以及包括植入物生存率、翻修原因和术后牛津髋关节评分在内的结果数据,并进行了详细的生存分析。主要结果是任何原因的翻修。还记录了翻修原因,包括股骨或髋臼失败以及翻修时间。
共纳入 1335 例 THA。使用 150 毫米股骨柄的有 516 例,使用 125 毫米股骨柄的有 819 例。由于在 150 毫米组中平均随访时间较长,标准股骨柄和短柄组分别分析了 4055.5 和 3227.8 个组件年。所有组的患者报告结果均相似。标准 150 毫米股骨柄(0.44 次/100 个组件年)和短 125 毫米股骨柄(0.56 次/100 个组件年)的翻修率相似,无统计学显著差异(p=0.240)。
与标准 150 毫米股骨柄相比,常规使用短 125 毫米股骨柄在翻修率或 PROMS 评分方面没有统计学显著影响。常规使用短水泥股骨植入物可能具有优势。