Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, Medical University of Łódź, Barlicki University Hospital, Łódź, Poland.
Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, Medical University of Łódź, Barlicki University Hospital, Łódź, Poland.
World Neurosurg. 2024 Jun;186:e539-e551. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.03.172. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
We aimed to identify independent risk factors of 30-day mortality in patients with surgically treated spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), validate the Surgical Swedish ICH (SwICH) score within Polish healthcare system, and compare the SwICH score to the ICH score.
We carried out a single-center retrospective analysis of the medical data juxtaposed with computed tomography scans of 136 ICH patients treated surgically between 2008 and 2022. Statistical analysis was performed using the same characteristics as in the SwICH score and the ICH score. Backward stepwise logistic regression with both 5-fold crossvalidation and 1000× bootstrap procedure was used to create new scoring system. Finally predictive potential of these scales were compared.
The most important predictors of 30-day mortality were: ICH volume (P < 0.01), Glasgow Coma Scale at admission (P < 0.01), anticoagulant status (P = 0.03), and age (P < 0.01). The SwICH score appears to have a better predictive potential than the ICH score, although this did not reach statistical significance [area under the curve {AUC}: 0.789 (95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.715-0.863) vs. AUC: 0.757 (95% CI: 0.677-0.837)]. Moreover, based on the analyzed characteristics, we developed our score (encompassing: age, ICH volume, anticoagulants status, Glasgow Coma Scale at admission), [AUC of 0.872 (95% CI: 0.815-0.929)]. This score was significantly better than previous ones.
Differences in health care systems seem to affect the accuracy of prognostic scales for patients with ICH, including possible differences in indications for surgery and postoperative care. Thus, it is important to validate assessment tools before they can be applied in a new setting and develop population-specific scores. This may improve the effectiveness of risk stratification in patients with ICH.
我们旨在确定接受手术治疗的自发性幕上脑出血(ICH)患者 30 天死亡率的独立危险因素,验证波兰医疗体系内的瑞典ICH(SwICH)评分,并将其与 ICH 评分进行比较。
我们对 2008 年至 2022 年间接受手术治疗的 136 例 ICH 患者的医疗数据和计算机断层扫描进行了单中心回顾性分析。使用与 SwICH 评分和 ICH 评分相同的特征进行统计学分析。使用 5 折交叉验证和 1000×引导程序的向后逐步逻辑回归创建新的评分系统。最后比较这些评分的预测潜力。
30 天死亡率的最重要预测因素是:ICH 体积(P<0.01)、入院时格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分(P<0.01)、抗凝状态(P=0.03)和年龄(P<0.01)。SwICH 评分的预测潜力似乎优于 ICH 评分,尽管这并未达到统计学意义[曲线下面积(AUC):0.789(95%置信区间:0.715-0.863)与 AUC:0.757(95% CI:0.677-0.837)]。此外,基于分析的特征,我们开发了我们的评分(包含:年龄、ICH 体积、抗凝状态、入院时格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分),[AUC 为 0.872(95% CI:0.815-0.929)]。该评分明显优于以前的评分。
医疗保健系统的差异似乎会影响 ICH 患者预后评分的准确性,包括手术和术后护理指征的可能差异。因此,在将评估工具应用于新环境之前,验证评估工具非常重要,并开发特定人群的评分。这可能会提高 ICH 患者的风险分层效果。