Suppr超能文献

经皮机械循环支持在右心衰竭中的应用。

Use of percutaneous mechanical circulatory support for right ventricular failure.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA.

Division of Cardiology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 May;103(6):909-916. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31018. Epub 2024 Apr 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Utilization of right ventricular mechanical circulatory support (RV-MCS) devices has been limited by a lack of recognition of RV failure as well as a lack of availability and experience with RV-MCS.

AIMS

We report a single-center experience with the use of percutaneous RV-MCS and report predictors of adverse outcomes.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. Data from consecutive patients who received RV-MCS for any indication between June 2015 and January 2022 were included. Data on baseline comorbidities, hemodynamics, and laboratory values were collected. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality analyzed as a logistic outcome in a multivariable model. These variables were further ranked by their predictive value.

RESULTS

Among 58 consecutive patients enrolled, the median age was 66 years, 31% were female and 53% were white. The majority of the patients (48%) were hospitalized for acute on chronic heart failure. The majority of the patients were SCAI SHOCK Stage D (67%) and 34 (64%) patients had MCS placed within 24 h of the onset of shock. Before placement of RV-MCS, median central venous pressure (CVP) and RV stroke work index were 20 mmHg and 8.9 g m/m, respectively. Median serum lactate was 3.5 (1.6, 6.2) mmol/L. Impella RP was implanted in 50% and ProtekDuo in the remaining 50%. Left ventricular MCS was concomitantly used in 66% of patients. Twenty-eight patients (48.3%) died. In these patients, median serum lactate was significantly higher (4.1 [2.3, 13.0] vs. 2.2 [1.4, 4.0]  mmol/L, p = 0.007) and a trend toward higher median CVP (24 [18, 31] vs. 19 [14, 24] mmHg, p = 0.052). In the multivariable logistic model, both serum lactate and CVP before RV-MCS placement were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. Serum lactate had the highest predictive value.

CONCLUSION

In our real-world cohort, 52% of patients treated with RV-MCS survived their index hospitalization. Serum lactate at presentation and CVP were the strongest predictors of in-hospital mortality.

摘要

背景

由于对右心室衰竭的认识不足以及右心室机械循环支持(RV-MCS)设备的可用性和经验有限,限制了其应用。

目的

我们报告了单中心应用经皮 RV-MCS 的经验,并报告了不良预后的预测因素。

方法

这是一项单中心回顾性队列研究。纳入 2015 年 6 月至 2022 年 1 月期间因任何原因接受 RV-MCS 的连续患者的数据。收集基线合并症、血液动力学和实验室值的数据。主要结局为住院期间死亡率,采用多变量模型中的逻辑结果进行分析。这些变量根据其预测价值进一步排序。

结果

在纳入的 58 例连续患者中,中位年龄为 66 岁,31%为女性,53%为白人。大多数患者(48%)因急性加重的慢性心力衰竭住院。大多数患者为 SCAI SHOCK 分期 D(67%),34 例(64%)患者在休克发作后 24 小时内放置 MCS。在放置 RV-MCS 之前,中位中心静脉压(CVP)和 RV 每搏功指数分别为 20mmHg 和 8.9g·m/m。中位血清乳酸为 3.5(1.6,6.2)mmol/L。植入 Impella RP 占 50%,植入 ProtekDuo 占 50%。50%的患者同时使用左心室 MCS。28 例(48.3%)患者死亡。在这些患者中,中位血清乳酸显著升高(4.1[2.3,13.0]vs.2.2[1.4,4.0]mmol/L,p=0.007),CVP 呈升高趋势(24[18,31]vs.19[14,24]mmHg,p=0.052)。多变量逻辑模型显示,RV-MCS 前的血清乳酸和 CVP 是住院期间死亡率的独立预测因素。血清乳酸的预测价值最高。

结论

在我们的真实世界队列中,52%接受 RV-MCS 治疗的患者在指数住院期间存活。入院时的血清乳酸和 CVP 是住院期间死亡率的最强预测因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验