Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Division of Cardiology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 May;103(6):909-916. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31018. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
Utilization of right ventricular mechanical circulatory support (RV-MCS) devices has been limited by a lack of recognition of RV failure as well as a lack of availability and experience with RV-MCS.
We report a single-center experience with the use of percutaneous RV-MCS and report predictors of adverse outcomes.
This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. Data from consecutive patients who received RV-MCS for any indication between June 2015 and January 2022 were included. Data on baseline comorbidities, hemodynamics, and laboratory values were collected. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality analyzed as a logistic outcome in a multivariable model. These variables were further ranked by their predictive value.
Among 58 consecutive patients enrolled, the median age was 66 years, 31% were female and 53% were white. The majority of the patients (48%) were hospitalized for acute on chronic heart failure. The majority of the patients were SCAI SHOCK Stage D (67%) and 34 (64%) patients had MCS placed within 24 h of the onset of shock. Before placement of RV-MCS, median central venous pressure (CVP) and RV stroke work index were 20 mmHg and 8.9 g m/m, respectively. Median serum lactate was 3.5 (1.6, 6.2) mmol/L. Impella RP was implanted in 50% and ProtekDuo in the remaining 50%. Left ventricular MCS was concomitantly used in 66% of patients. Twenty-eight patients (48.3%) died. In these patients, median serum lactate was significantly higher (4.1 [2.3, 13.0] vs. 2.2 [1.4, 4.0] mmol/L, p = 0.007) and a trend toward higher median CVP (24 [18, 31] vs. 19 [14, 24] mmHg, p = 0.052). In the multivariable logistic model, both serum lactate and CVP before RV-MCS placement were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. Serum lactate had the highest predictive value.
In our real-world cohort, 52% of patients treated with RV-MCS survived their index hospitalization. Serum lactate at presentation and CVP were the strongest predictors of in-hospital mortality.
由于对右心室衰竭的认识不足以及右心室机械循环支持(RV-MCS)设备的可用性和经验有限,限制了其应用。
我们报告了单中心应用经皮 RV-MCS 的经验,并报告了不良预后的预测因素。
这是一项单中心回顾性队列研究。纳入 2015 年 6 月至 2022 年 1 月期间因任何原因接受 RV-MCS 的连续患者的数据。收集基线合并症、血液动力学和实验室值的数据。主要结局为住院期间死亡率,采用多变量模型中的逻辑结果进行分析。这些变量根据其预测价值进一步排序。
在纳入的 58 例连续患者中,中位年龄为 66 岁,31%为女性,53%为白人。大多数患者(48%)因急性加重的慢性心力衰竭住院。大多数患者为 SCAI SHOCK 分期 D(67%),34 例(64%)患者在休克发作后 24 小时内放置 MCS。在放置 RV-MCS 之前,中位中心静脉压(CVP)和 RV 每搏功指数分别为 20mmHg 和 8.9g·m/m。中位血清乳酸为 3.5(1.6,6.2)mmol/L。植入 Impella RP 占 50%,植入 ProtekDuo 占 50%。50%的患者同时使用左心室 MCS。28 例(48.3%)患者死亡。在这些患者中,中位血清乳酸显著升高(4.1[2.3,13.0]vs.2.2[1.4,4.0]mmol/L,p=0.007),CVP 呈升高趋势(24[18,31]vs.19[14,24]mmHg,p=0.052)。多变量逻辑模型显示,RV-MCS 前的血清乳酸和 CVP 是住院期间死亡率的独立预测因素。血清乳酸的预测价值最高。
在我们的真实世界队列中,52%接受 RV-MCS 治疗的患者在指数住院期间存活。入院时的血清乳酸和 CVP 是住院期间死亡率的最强预测因素。