Currò Jessica M, Santonocito Cristina, Merola Federica, Messina Simone, Sanfilippo Marco, Brancati Serena, Drago Filippo, Sanfilippo Filippo
School of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.
Policlinico G. Rodolico - San Marco University Hospital, Catania, Italy.
J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2024 Apr 8;4(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s44158-024-00159-1.
Propofol is the most commonly used hypnotic agent used during sedation and general anesthesia (GA) practice, offering faster recovery compared to benzodiazepines. However, cardiovascular impact of propofol and pain at injection are commonly encountered side effects. Ciprofol is a novel disubstituted phenol derivative, and there is growing evidence regarding its clinical use.
We conducted a systematic literature search (updated on 23 July 2023) to evaluate safety and efficacy of ciprofol in comparison to propofol in patients undergoing procedures under sedation or GA. We focused on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) only, extrapolating data on onset and offset, and on the side effects and the pain at injection.
The search revealed 14 RCTs, all conducted in China. Eight RCTs studied patients undergoing sedation, and six focused on GA. Bolus of ciprofol for sedation or induction of GA varied from 0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg. In four studies using ciprofol for maintenance of GA, it was 0.8-2.4 mg/kg/h. Ciprofol pharmacokinetics seemed characterized by slower onset and offset as compared to propofol. Pain during injection was less frequent in the ciprofol group in all the 13 studies reporting it. Eight studies reported "adverse events" as a pooled outcome, and in five cases, the incidence was higher in the propofol group, not different in the remaining ones. Occurrence of hypotension was the most commonly investigated side effects, and it seemed less frequent with ciprofol.
Ciprofol for sedation or GA may be safer than propofol, though its pharmacokinetics may be less advantageous.
丙泊酚是镇静和全身麻醉(GA)实践中最常用的催眠剂,与苯二氮䓬类药物相比,其恢复速度更快。然而,丙泊酚对心血管的影响和注射时的疼痛是常见的副作用。环泊酚是一种新型的二取代苯酚衍生物,关于其临床应用的证据越来越多。
我们进行了一项系统的文献检索(于2023年7月23日更新),以评估环泊酚与丙泊酚相比在接受镇静或GA的患者中的安全性和有效性。我们仅关注随机对照试验(RCT),推断起效和消退的数据,以及副作用和注射时的疼痛。
检索发现了14项RCT,均在中国进行。8项RCT研究了接受镇静的患者,6项聚焦于GA。用于镇静或GA诱导的环泊酚推注剂量为0.2至0.5mg/kg。在4项使用环泊酚维持GA的研究中,剂量为0.8 - 2.4mg/kg/h。与丙泊酚相比,环泊酚的药代动力学似乎具有起效和消退较慢的特点。在所有13项报告注射疼痛的研究中,环泊酚组注射时疼痛的发生率较低。8项研究将“不良事件”作为汇总结果报告,在5例中,丙泊酚组的发生率较高,其余情况无差异。低血压的发生是最常研究的副作用,环泊酚组似乎发生率较低。
用于镇静或GA时,环泊酚可能比丙泊酚更安全,尽管其药代动力学可能不那么有利。