Shaik Izaz, Veluru Keerthini, Sai Pranathi Gundimeda Naga, Jeevan Kakumanu Navya, Gowraram Sanjupriya, Pasupuleti Sowmya, Dikkala Naga Sri Samharsha
Lakewood Family Dental, Bloomington, Illinios, USA.
Government Dental College and Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India, Masters in Health Informatics at University of North Texas, Texas, United States.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Feb;16(Suppl 1):S87-S89. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_555_23. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
In this systematic review, we assessed whether the effects of the usage of various devices help with magnification in endodontics and whether they resulted in any significant changes in the clinical result of treatment.
An exhaustive search was performed across MEDLINE and Cochrane Registers for various clinical studies, which were focused on comparing regenerative endodontic treatment based on the usage of magnification devices. Various terms were used to search these clinical trials such as microscope, regenerative endodontic surgery, apicoectomy, endoscope, and loupes.
After scrutinizing the studies, around three clinical trials based on magnification in endodontic surgeries were included in the present review. It was observed that no statistically noteworthy betterment of treatment outcome was seen in patients treated with either of the magnification devices such as loupes and microscope.
It was evident that these magnification devices can alter the effectiveness of regenerative endodontic treatment in a very minimal way. However, we believe that more randomized clinical studies should be conducted in this area.
在本系统评价中,我们评估了各种设备的使用是否有助于牙髓病学中的放大,以及它们是否导致治疗临床结果发生任何显著变化。
在MEDLINE和Cochrane注册库中对各种临床研究进行了详尽检索,这些研究聚焦于比较基于放大设备使用的再生牙髓治疗。使用了各种术语来检索这些临床试验,如显微镜、再生牙髓手术、根尖切除术、内窥镜和放大镜。
在仔细审查这些研究后,本评价纳入了约三项基于牙髓手术放大的临床试验。观察到,使用放大镜和显微镜等放大设备治疗的患者,治疗结果在统计学上没有显著改善。
显然,这些放大设备对再生牙髓治疗效果的改变非常微小。然而,我们认为该领域应开展更多随机对照临床研究。