Wang Yanfang, Yao Jingmin
School of Business, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, 214122, China.
School of Economics and Resource Management, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China.
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 26;10(7):e28745. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28745. eCollection 2024 Apr 15.
To examine whether the low-carbon city pilot (LCCP) policy influences the green technology innovation (GTI) or embodied technology introduction (ETI), two different pathways to green technology progress, in manufacturing enterprises in China, this study employs a staggered difference-in-difference (DID) model to evaluate the effects of the policy. The findings suggest that the LCCP policy has stimulated an increase in the quantity of GTI and ETI among enterprises, but reduced the quality of innovation. Large, high-carbon-intensity, and state-owned enterprises are more likely to engage in GTI, while small, low-carbon-intensity, and non-state-owned enterprises prefer ETI. The policy is effective in alleviating financing constraints and improving environmental concerns. Both GTI and ETI play a crucial role in economic performance, while the latter also promotes environmental and ESG performance. Accordingly, we recommend establishing a policy-compatible evaluation system, strengthening mandatory and incentive measures, and cultivating a green innovation ecosystem, etc., to improve the performance of the LCCP policy.
为检验低碳城市试点(LCCP)政策是否会影响中国制造业企业的绿色技术创新(GTI)或体现技术引进(ETI)这两条不同的绿色技术进步路径,本研究采用交错双重差分(DID)模型来评估该政策的效果。研究结果表明,LCCP政策刺激了企业中GTI和ETI数量的增加,但降低了创新质量。大型、高碳强度和国有企业更倾向于进行GTI,而小型、低碳强度和非国有企业则更青睐ETI。该政策在缓解融资约束和改善环境关切方面是有效的。GTI和ETI在经济绩效中都发挥着关键作用,而后者还促进了环境和ESG绩效。因此,我们建议建立一个与政策兼容的评估体系,加强强制性和激励性措施,并培育绿色创新生态系统等,以提高LCCP政策的绩效。