Inova L.J. Murphy Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Falls Church, Virginia.
University of Virginia, School of Education, Charlottesville, Virginia.
West J Emerg Med. 2024 Mar;25(2):186-190. doi: 10.5811/westjem.18581.
Virtual interviews (VI) are now a permanent part of pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) recruitment, especially given the cost and equity advantages. Yet inability to visit programs in person can impact decision-making, leading applicants to apply to more programs. Moreover, the cost advantages of VI may encourage applicants to apply to programs farther away than they might otherwise have been willing or able to travel. This could create unnecessary strain on programs. We conducted this study to determine whether PEM fellowship applicants would apply to a larger number of programs and in different geographic patterns with VI (2020 and 2021) as compared to in-person interviews (2018 and 2019).
We conducted an anonymous national survey of all PEM fellows comparing two cohorts: current fellows who interviewed inperson (applied in 2018/2019) and fellows who underwent VIs in 2020/2021 (current fellows and those recently matched in 2021). The study took place in March-April 2022. Questions focused on geographic considerations during interviews and the match. We used descriptive statistics, chi-square and -tests for analysis.
Overall response rate was 42% (231/550); 32% (n = 74) interviewed in person and 68% (n = 157) virtually. Fellows applied to a median of 4/6 geographic regions (interquartile range 2, 5). Most applied for fellowship both in the same region as residency (216, 93%) and outside (192, 83%). Only the Pacific region saw a statistically significant increase in applicants during VI (59.9% vs 43.2%, = 0.02). There was no statistical difference in the number of programs applied to during in-person vs VI (mean difference (95% confidence interval 0.72, -2.8 - 4.2). A majority matched in their preferred state both during VI (60.4%) and in-person interviews (65.7%). The difference was not statistically significant ( = 0.45).
While more PEM fellowship applicants applied outside the geographic area where their residency was and to the Pacific region, there was no overall increase in the number of programs or geographic areas PEM applicants applied to during VI as compared to in-person interview seasons. As this was the first two years of VI, ongoing data collection will further identify trends and the impactof VI.
虚拟面试(VI)现在是儿科学急诊医学(PEM)招聘的一个永久组成部分,尤其是考虑到成本和公平优势。然而,无法亲自访问项目可能会影响决策,导致申请人申请更多的项目。此外,VI 的成本优势可能会鼓励申请人申请更远的项目,而不是他们可能愿意或能够前往的项目。这可能会给项目带来不必要的压力。我们进行了这项研究,以确定与面对面面试(2018 年和 2019 年)相比,在 VI(2020 年和 2021 年)中 PEM 研究员是否会申请更多的项目和不同的地理模式。
我们对所有 PEM 研究员进行了一项匿名全国调查,将两组研究员进行了比较:目前进行了面对面面试的研究员(2018/2019 年申请)和 2020/2021 年进行了 VI 的研究员(目前的研究员和 2021 年最近匹配的研究员)。研究于 2022 年 3 月至 4 月进行。问题集中在面试和匹配期间的地理考虑因素上。我们使用描述性统计、卡方检验和 t 检验进行分析。
总体回复率为 42%(231/550);32%(n=74)进行了面对面面试,68%(n=157)进行了 VI。研究员申请了中位数为 4/6 个地理区域(四分位距 2,5)。大多数研究员都在居住所在地区(216,93%)和非居住所在地区(192,83%)申请了研究员职位。只有太平洋地区的申请人在 VI 期间呈统计学上显著增加(59.9% vs 43.2%,=0.02)。在面对面面试和 VI 期间申请的项目数量没有统计学差异(平均差异(95%置信区间 0.72,-2.8-4.2)。大多数研究员在 VI(60.4%)和面对面面试(65.7%)中都选择了他们首选的州。差异无统计学意义(=0.45)。
虽然更多的 PEM 研究员申请了居住地区以外的地理区域和太平洋地区,但与面对面面试季节相比,PEM 申请人在 VI 期间申请的项目或地理区域数量并没有总体增加。由于这是 VI 的头两年,正在进行的数据收集将进一步确定趋势和 VI 的影响。