Biometrics Department, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 2-1-1 Nihonbashi-Muromachi, Chuo-Ku, Tokyo, 103-8324, Japan.
Department of Management Science, Graduate School of Engineering, Tokyo University of Science, Tokyo, Japan.
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024 Jul;58(4):721-729. doi: 10.1007/s43441-024-00640-7. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
Progression-free survival (PFS) is used to evaluate treatment effects in cancer clinical trials. Disease progression (DP) in patients is typically determined by radiological testing at several scheduled tumor-assessment time points. This produces a discrepancy between the true progression time and the observed progression time. When the observed progression time is considered as the true progression time, a positively biased PFS is obtained for some patients, and the estimated survival function derived by the Kaplan-Meier method is also biased.
While the midpoint imputation method is available and replaces interval-censored data with midpoint data, it unrealistically assumes that several DPs occur at the same time point when several DPs are observed within the same tumor-assessment interval. We enhanced the midpoint imputation method by replacing interval-censored data with equally spaced timepoint data based on the number of observed interval-censored data within the same tumor-assessment interval.
The root mean square error of the median of the enhanced method is almost always smaller than that of the midpoint imputation regardless of the tumor-assessment frequency. The coverage probability of the enhanced method is close to the nominal confidence level of 95% in most scenarios.
We believe that the enhanced method, which builds upon the midpoint imputation method, is more effective than the midpoint imputation method itself.
无进展生存期 (PFS) 用于评估癌症临床试验中的治疗效果。患者的疾病进展 (DP) 通常通过在几个预定的肿瘤评估时间点进行影像学检查来确定。这导致真实进展时间与观察到的进展时间之间存在差异。当观察到的进展时间被视为真实的进展时间时,一些患者的 PFS 会得到正向偏倚,并且通过 Kaplan-Meier 方法得出的估计生存函数也会受到偏倚。
虽然中点插补法可用于用中点数据替换区间删失数据,但当在同一肿瘤评估间隔内观察到多个 DP 时,它不合理地假设几个 DP 同时发生。我们通过根据同一肿瘤评估间隔内观察到的区间删失数据的数量,用等间隔时间点数据替换区间删失数据,从而增强了中点插补法。
增强方法的中位数的均方根误差几乎总是小于中点插补法,无论肿瘤评估频率如何。在大多数情况下,增强方法的覆盖率接近名义置信水平 95%。
我们认为,在中点插补法的基础上进行增强的方法比中点插补法本身更有效。