Sorokhaibam Sachin Singh, Chandra Atika, Baishya Ratul, Barik Saroj Kanta, Goel Shailendra, Tandon Rajesh
Department of Botany, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India.
Department of Botany, Maitreyi College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India.
Front Plant Sci. 2024 Mar 28;15:1355680. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1355680. eCollection 2024.
Infraspecific floral trait variations may appear in response to elevational differences in alpine plant species. There is enormous information on the selection of such morphs mediated by biotic and/or abiotic variables. Whether such differences contribute to differences in reproductive strategy and mating outcomes is rarely investigated. We investigated these aspects in two distinct elevational floral morphs (Red and Pink) of Sm. in Western Himalaya. The red morphs occupy the lower elevations while pink morphs the higher elevations. The two morphs differ in floral traits like phenology, dimension, display, quality of floral rewards, and pollinators that happen to influence interaction with available pollinator pool at each elevation. The pink morph exhibits entomophily, while the red ones show ornithophily. Although experimental pollinations established that both the morphs are self-compatible, selfing results in significantly lower fruit-set than either cross- or open-pollinations. The outcrossing rate in the red morph, as determined by using simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers, was higher (t=0.82) than that in the pink morph (t=0.76), with a tendency of the latter to be shifting towards mixed-mating strategy. However, the extent of biparental inbreeding was comparable among the two morphs. It is inferred that the differences in the mating outcomes among the morphs in the tree species are linked to those emerging from floral traits and the pollination by different functional groups of floral visitors.
种下的花部性状变异可能会因高山植物物种的海拔差异而出现。关于由生物和/或非生物变量介导的此类形态选择,有大量信息。然而,这些差异是否会导致繁殖策略和交配结果的差异,却很少有人研究。我们在西喜马拉雅地区的两种不同海拔的花部形态(红色和粉色)的高山柳(Salix myrtillacea)中研究了这些方面。红色形态占据较低海拔,而粉色形态占据较高海拔。这两种形态在物候、尺寸、展示、花部报酬质量以及传粉者等花部性状上存在差异,这些差异恰好会影响在每个海拔与可用传粉者群体的相互作用。粉色形态表现为虫媒传粉,而红色形态表现为鸟媒传粉。尽管实验授粉表明这两种形态都是自交亲和的,但自交导致的坐果率明显低于杂交或开放授粉。通过使用简单序列重复(SSR)标记确定,红色形态的异交率(t = 0.82)高于粉色形态(t = 0.76),且粉色形态有向混合交配策略转变的趋势。然而,双亲近交的程度在这两种形态中相当。据推断,该树种不同形态之间交配结果的差异与花部性状以及不同功能组的花访者传粉所产生的差异有关。