School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK; Paediatric Neurology Department, Royal Aberdeen Children's Hospital, Aberdeen, UK.
Epilepsy Behav. 2024 May;154:109743. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.109743. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
In recent years, adjunctive therapies for epilepsy management are being explored due to considerable side effects carried by antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and widespread reports of drug-resistant epilepsy. One such approach is non-invasive musical neurostimulation. Within this context, Mozart's sonata K448 has received particular attention following reports of reduced seizure frequency and a decrease in epileptiform discharges during and after music exposure; often described as the 'Mozart effect'. However, controversy exists around the effectiveness of K448 in epilepsy and the strength and quality of the evidence supporting it. Therefore, this study aims to systematically review the available literature around the Mozart effect, in both adult and paediatric cases of epilepsy.
We carried out a literature search on PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus and Web of Science using the query string ALL= (Mozart AND epileps*). Selected clinical studies were classified based on the age of the population studied, as paediatric (0-18 years), adult (19 years or older) or a combination of the two. All the studies were evaluated using the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice (JHNEBP) rating scale to determine the strength of the evidence (level) and the quality of the research evidence.
Out of 538 records, 25 studies were selected, grouped based on the age of the population studied and evaluated using the JHNEBP rating scale. Ten level 1 studies, which represent the strongest evidence, were identified, including six RCTs and three meta-analyses. Nine of these ten studies show a decrease in epileptiform discharges and in seizure frequency following exposure to Mozart's K448. One multiverse analysis reported lack of statistically significant evidence to support the use of K448 in epilepsy or any other medical condition.
A growing body of evidence supports the Mozart effect on epilepsy, with notable studies including RCTs and comprehensive meta-analyses. This review identified nine level 1 studies, conducted by research groups worldwide, which endorse the use of Mozart's music to reduce seizures and epileptiform discharges in adult and paediatric epilepsy patients. However, existing research exhibits limitations like varying protocols, small sample sizes and diverse treatment regimens. Additionally, studies that combine adult and paediatric patients fail to take account of developmental differences between these two groups - particularly with regards to brain maturation and neurophysiology - which could negatively impact upon the accuracy of findings by obscuring important age-related differences in response to intervention. Adequately addressing these limitations will be crucial to demonstrating proof of concept; otherwise, a potentially valuable, non-invasive, accessible, and affordable therapeutic option for drug-resistant epilepsy will remain on the medical fringe. Further research with larger samples and stricter protocols, particularly considering patient age and drug regimens, is required.
由于抗癫痫药物(AEDs)带来的相当大的副作用以及广泛报道的耐药性癫痫,近年来,人们正在探索癫痫管理的辅助疗法。一种这样的方法是非侵入性音乐神经刺激。在此背景下,莫扎特的奏鸣曲 K448 受到了特别关注,因为有报道称在接触音乐期间和之后,癫痫发作的频率降低,癫痫样放电减少,通常被称为“莫扎特效应”。然而,关于 K448 在癫痫中的有效性以及支持它的证据的强度和质量存在争议。因此,本研究旨在系统地综述莫扎特效应在成人和儿科癫痫病例中的现有文献。
我们使用查询字符串 ALL= (Mozart AND epileps*) 在 PubMed、Science Direct、Scopus 和 Web of Science 上进行了文献检索。根据研究人群的年龄,将选定的临床研究分为儿科(0-18 岁)、成人(19 岁或以上)或两者的组合。使用约翰霍普金斯护理循证实践(JHNEBP)评级量表对所有研究进行评估,以确定证据的强度(水平)和研究证据的质量。
在 538 条记录中,选择了 25 项研究,根据研究人群的年龄分组,并使用 JHNEBP 评级量表进行评估。确定了 10 项具有最强证据的 1 级研究,其中包括 6 项 RCT 和 3 项荟萃分析。这 10 项研究中有 9 项表明,在接触莫扎特的 K448 后,癫痫样放电和癫痫发作频率均降低。一项多元分析报告缺乏统计学上显著的证据支持 K448 在癫痫或任何其他医疗条件下的使用。
越来越多的证据支持莫扎特对癫痫的影响,其中包括具有 RCT 和综合荟萃分析的重要研究。本综述确定了 9 项 1 级研究,这些研究由全球研究小组进行,支持使用莫扎特的音乐来减少成年和儿科癫痫患者的癫痫发作和癫痫样放电。然而,现有研究存在一些局限性,如不同的方案、样本量小和不同的治疗方案。此外,将成年和儿科患者合并在一起的研究没有考虑到这两个群体之间的发育差异,特别是在大脑成熟和神经生理学方面,这可能会因干预后对年龄相关差异的反应而使研究结果产生偏差。充分解决这些局限性对于证明概念至关重要,否则,对于耐药性癫痫,一种潜在的有价值的、非侵入性的、易于获得的和负担得起的治疗选择将仍然处于医学边缘。需要进行更多具有更大样本量和更严格方案的研究,特别是要考虑患者年龄和药物方案。