Suppr超能文献

治疗抵抗性抑郁症成人患者中使用氯胺酮和 Esketamine 的需要治疗人数(NNT):系统评价和荟萃分析。

Number needed to treat (NNT) for ketamine and esketamine in adults with treatment-resistant depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Brain and Cognition Discovery Foundation, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Brain and Cognition Discovery Foundation, Toronto, ON, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2024 Jul 1;356:753-762. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.04.039. Epub 2024 Apr 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ketamine has been established as efficacious in adults living with Treatment-resistant Depression (TRD). Toward providing a quantifiable estimate of the clinical meaningfulness of the therapeutic benefit of ketamine, herein, we conduct a systematic review that aims to report the Number Needed to Treat (NNT) and the Number Needed to Harm (NNH).

METHODS

This systematic review searched Embase, Medline/Pubmed, PsycINFO and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception up to October 15th 2023, for placebo-controlled, Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) assessing racemic ketamine or esketamine therapy for unipolar TRD. We calculated NNT and NNH for ketamine treatments over various time points.

RESULTS

A total of 21 studies with 2042 participants were included. Racemic ketamine treatments had pooled NNTs for response of 7 at 4 h, 3 from one day to one week and 9 for studies at four weeks. Esketamine treatment was found to have a similar efficacy with an NNT of 2 at one day and 11 at four weeks. NNH values indicated low risk for ketamine treatments.

LIMITATIONS

Limitations in the data used include the possibility of functional unblinding and selective reporting bias. Moreover, the meta-analysis may have been limited in its precision by including low threshold definitions of treatment resistance (≥ 1 failed antidepressant) and low-dose ketamine treatments.

CONCLUSION

Herein, we determined that the NNT for ketamine treatment in adults living with TRD across different intervals of observation was <10. We conclude that the NNTs observed herein are highly clinically meaningful in this difficult to treat disorder.

摘要

背景

氯胺酮已被证实对治疗抵抗性抑郁症(TRD)患者有效。为了定量评估氯胺酮治疗的临床获益的实际意义,本研究进行了一项系统评价,旨在报告需要治疗的人数(NNT)和需要治疗的人数(NNH)。

方法

本系统评价检索了 Embase、Medline/Pubmed、PsycINFO 和 ClinicalTrials.gov 数据库,从建库至 2023 年 10 月 15 日,纳入评估单一性别氯胺酮或 Esketamine 治疗单相 TRD 的安慰剂对照随机对照试验(RCT)。我们计算了不同时间点氯胺酮治疗的 NNT 和 NNH。

结果

共有 21 项研究、2042 名参与者纳入本研究。氯胺酮治疗的汇总 NNT 为:4 小时时反应率为 7,1 天至 1 周时为 3,4 周时为 9。Esketamine 治疗的疗效相似,1 天时的 NNT 为 2,4 周时为 11。NNH 值表明氯胺酮治疗的风险较低。

局限性

所使用数据的局限性包括可能存在功能失盲和选择性报告偏倚。此外,由于纳入了治疗抵抗(≥1 种抗抑郁药治疗失败)和低剂量氯胺酮治疗的低阈值定义,meta 分析可能在其准确性上受到限制。

结论

本研究确定了不同观察间隔氯胺酮治疗成人 TRD 的 NNT<10。我们得出结论,在此类难以治疗的疾病中,本研究观察到的 NNTs 具有高度的临床意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验